Call Details
Bolna ID:
4729f27e-6957-42ec-af1f-c8a115b844be
Phone: +918124002995
From: +918035316264
Status: completed
Processing: COMPLETED
Duration: 12.70s
Cost: ₹2.34
Hangup Details
Hangup By: Callee
Reason: Call recipient hungup
Timestamps
Started:
2025-11-04 14:09:24
Ended:
Not set
Last Processed:
2025-11-04 14:11:24
Last Retry At:
2025-11-04 14:11:24
Next Retry Scheduled:
2025-11-04 14:15:06
Next Call Scheduled:
2025-11-04 14:15:06
Call Timeline 10
Call History (Raw Callbacks) 5
{created_at_str=2025-11-04 08:39:25, agent_id=db818162-fabe-4ac8-8a6a-c61223150a70, total_cost=2.34, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=1.71, transcriber=0.0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=1.71}, llm=0.132, transfer_cost=0.0, platform=0.5, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0.0}, network=0.875, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0.003, extraction=0, conversation=0.094, hangup=0.035}}, created_at=2025-11-04T08:39:25.323383, scheduled_at=2025-11-04T08:39:25.323341, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=13.0, to_number=+918124002995, provider_call_id=19da2ff5-cd81-4e04-82e7-cf079e22f63c, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=https://aps1.media.plivo.com/v1/Account/MAZTZJNZBKOWQXMZBIZJ/Recording/c4fb214b-9a91-4d2c-9af6-e091e79f5d23.mp3, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=4000, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=Callee, hangup_reason=Call recipient hungup}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+918124002995, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-11-04 13:58:55, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=PRIYANKАМОНАРАTRA, resume_review_id=6909b90118c34103789184eb, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=60, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume layout is mostly clear and structured logically, but could benefit from increased visual hierarchy to differentiate sections more effectively. The use of distinct headings, consistent formatting, and clearer separation between sections would improve overall readability., score=65, readability=The language in the resume is generally clear and straightforward, yet some sections feel cramped due to lack of spacing. Improving whitespace distribution between lines and sections would enhance readability and comprehension of key information., essentialSectionsPresence=All essential sections such as Summary, Experience, Education, and Skills are present, ensuring that the resume maintains a comprehensive framework. However, incorporating a well-structured Achievements or Certifications section could further enhance content value., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=ATS readability could be improved by incorporating more industry-specific keywords, particularly around technologies and tools. The layout largely supports ATS parsing, but optimizing keyword density and strategic placement would enhance appeal., score=62, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as names, positions, and contact information are well-structured to comply with ATS requirements. However, introducing more relevant keywords based on target roles would increase matching potential within ATS filters.}, impact={feedback=Impact in the resume is moderately demonstrated with some quantifiable achievements but could be more pronounced with specific metrics. Utilizing stronger, active verbs and diversifying language across accomplishments would considerably amplify impact., score=58, spellCheck=The resume appears to be free from spelling errors at a glance, indicating basic proofreading is in effect. However, a thorough review to catch minor grammatical inconsistencies would enhance professional presentation., bulletPointsUsage=The use of bullet points to list experience and accomplishments is solid, but they can be made more concise to highlight achievements more sharply. Ensuring each bullet captures a unique contribution without redundancy could improve clarity and impact., weakActionVerbs=A few weak verbs like 'Involved' and 'Support' undermine the dynamic nature of the roles; stronger action verbs should be employed. Replacing these with words like 'Spearheaded' or 'Facilitated' would elevate the descriptions' assertiveness., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=Quantifiable data such as 'improved quality by 20%' are sparsely included and should be more prevalent throughout to demonstrate specific successes. Adding more tangible outcomes would enhance the persuasiveness of the accomplishments presented., repetitionAvoidance=There is some repetition of action verbs like 'Collaborate' and 'Involved,' which could be reduced by utilizing a broader range of synonyms. Diversifying language would provide a fresher narrative across the role descriptions., accomplishmentLanguage=Language is generally focused on activities rather than results, needing a shift toward more accomplishment-oriented phrasing. Framing experiences around outcomes and results, rather than duties, would better showcase impact.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is of reasonable length considering the professional experience but contains overly long bullet points. Cutting superfluous details and focusing on highlights would improve crispness and keep content to the essentials., resumeLength=The resume is proportionate for a candidate with extensive experience but could benefit from tightening to prevent unnecessary verbosity. Striking a balance between thoroughness and precision would help maintain engagement., score=55, bulletPointsCount=The number of bullet points is adequate, but the points themselves need refinement to convey information concisely. Limiting each bullet point to a single, impactful idea would enhance clarity and focus., fillerWords=Various filler words and excess descriptions reduce the sharpness of the presented information. Eliminating redundant terms and streamlining language would increase the resume's effectiveness and sharpness., bulletPointLength=Bullet points are lengthy, often spanning over two lines, which can dilute the impact and reduce readability. Shortening bullet points to one line by focusing on key results or actions would improve information delivery., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume generally avoids excessive jargon and buzzwords, though more specific language could enrich descriptions. Adherence to stylistic details, including a few lapses, slightly hinders the professional presentation., score=60, buzzwordsCliches=The avoidance of clichés is appreciated, yet substituting vague terms like 'excellent' and 'expert' with concrete examples could enhance credibility. Providing instances or results instead of broad claims would lend authenticity., datesFormatting=Inconsistencies in date formatting across entries are identifiable, which might confuse chronology for readers. Ensuring uniformity, such as sticking consistently to 'Month Year' format across all sections, would tidy presentation., activeVoice=The resume successfully employs active voice in most sections, but some sentences slip into passive constructions. Rephrasing such instances to emphasize direct action would add vitality and clarity., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The document admirably avoids personal pronoun use, maintaining a professional third-party tone throughout. Continued use of such structure is within best practices for resume writing.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=assistant: Hi is that PRIYANKАМОНАРАTRA?
user: hello
assistant: Times- of- India Group
, updated_at=2025-11-04T08:40:23.342395, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-11-04 08:40:23, id=4729f27e-6957-42ec-af1f-c8a115b844be, campaign_id=null, summary=The conversation begins with the agent greeting the user and confirming their identity as PRIYANKАMONARАTRA. The user responds with a simple "hello," and the agent identifies themselves as being from the Times of India Group., error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction={"asst_T3MUlbYNAcyJN8Sd6SgOdOpc": {"dispositions": {"disposition_1": "No Response", "disposition_2": "", "disposition_3": ""}}}, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction={asst_T3MUlbYNAcyJN8Sd6SgOdOpc={dispositions={disposition_1=No Response, disposition_2=, disposition_3=}}}, smart_status=dropped, conversation_duration=12.7, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=200, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=171, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=29}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={gpt-4o-mini={output=50, input=28}, azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=37, input=2200}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization={output=50, input=28, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=gpt-4o-mini}, extraction=null, conversation={output=37, input=2200, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup={output=7, input=2361, provider_connected=false, provider=openai, model=gpt-4o-mini}}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-11-04 08:39:25, status=completed}
{created_at_str=2025-11-04 08:39:25, agent_id=db818162-fabe-4ac8-8a6a-c61223150a70, total_cost=1.84, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=1.71, transcriber=0.0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=1.71}, llm=0.132, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0.0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0.003, extraction=0, conversation=0.094, hangup=0.035}}, created_at=2025-11-04T08:39:25.323383, scheduled_at=2025-11-04T08:39:25.323341, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+918124002995, provider_call_id=19da2ff5-cd81-4e04-82e7-cf079e22f63c, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+918124002995, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-11-04 13:58:55, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=PRIYANKАМОНАРАTRA, resume_review_id=6909b90118c34103789184eb, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=60, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume layout is mostly clear and structured logically, but could benefit from increased visual hierarchy to differentiate sections more effectively. The use of distinct headings, consistent formatting, and clearer separation between sections would improve overall readability., score=65, readability=The language in the resume is generally clear and straightforward, yet some sections feel cramped due to lack of spacing. Improving whitespace distribution between lines and sections would enhance readability and comprehension of key information., essentialSectionsPresence=All essential sections such as Summary, Experience, Education, and Skills are present, ensuring that the resume maintains a comprehensive framework. However, incorporating a well-structured Achievements or Certifications section could further enhance content value., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=ATS readability could be improved by incorporating more industry-specific keywords, particularly around technologies and tools. The layout largely supports ATS parsing, but optimizing keyword density and strategic placement would enhance appeal., score=62, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as names, positions, and contact information are well-structured to comply with ATS requirements. However, introducing more relevant keywords based on target roles would increase matching potential within ATS filters.}, impact={feedback=Impact in the resume is moderately demonstrated with some quantifiable achievements but could be more pronounced with specific metrics. Utilizing stronger, active verbs and diversifying language across accomplishments would considerably amplify impact., score=58, spellCheck=The resume appears to be free from spelling errors at a glance, indicating basic proofreading is in effect. However, a thorough review to catch minor grammatical inconsistencies would enhance professional presentation., bulletPointsUsage=The use of bullet points to list experience and accomplishments is solid, but they can be made more concise to highlight achievements more sharply. Ensuring each bullet captures a unique contribution without redundancy could improve clarity and impact., weakActionVerbs=A few weak verbs like 'Involved' and 'Support' undermine the dynamic nature of the roles; stronger action verbs should be employed. Replacing these with words like 'Spearheaded' or 'Facilitated' would elevate the descriptions' assertiveness., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=Quantifiable data such as 'improved quality by 20%' are sparsely included and should be more prevalent throughout to demonstrate specific successes. Adding more tangible outcomes would enhance the persuasiveness of the accomplishments presented., repetitionAvoidance=There is some repetition of action verbs like 'Collaborate' and 'Involved,' which could be reduced by utilizing a broader range of synonyms. Diversifying language would provide a fresher narrative across the role descriptions., accomplishmentLanguage=Language is generally focused on activities rather than results, needing a shift toward more accomplishment-oriented phrasing. Framing experiences around outcomes and results, rather than duties, would better showcase impact.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is of reasonable length considering the professional experience but contains overly long bullet points. Cutting superfluous details and focusing on highlights would improve crispness and keep content to the essentials., resumeLength=The resume is proportionate for a candidate with extensive experience but could benefit from tightening to prevent unnecessary verbosity. Striking a balance between thoroughness and precision would help maintain engagement., score=55, bulletPointsCount=The number of bullet points is adequate, but the points themselves need refinement to convey information concisely. Limiting each bullet point to a single, impactful idea would enhance clarity and focus., fillerWords=Various filler words and excess descriptions reduce the sharpness of the presented information. Eliminating redundant terms and streamlining language would increase the resume's effectiveness and sharpness., bulletPointLength=Bullet points are lengthy, often spanning over two lines, which can dilute the impact and reduce readability. Shortening bullet points to one line by focusing on key results or actions would improve information delivery., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume generally avoids excessive jargon and buzzwords, though more specific language could enrich descriptions. Adherence to stylistic details, including a few lapses, slightly hinders the professional presentation., score=60, buzzwordsCliches=The avoidance of clichés is appreciated, yet substituting vague terms like 'excellent' and 'expert' with concrete examples could enhance credibility. Providing instances or results instead of broad claims would lend authenticity., datesFormatting=Inconsistencies in date formatting across entries are identifiable, which might confuse chronology for readers. Ensuring uniformity, such as sticking consistently to 'Month Year' format across all sections, would tidy presentation., activeVoice=The resume successfully employs active voice in most sections, but some sentences slip into passive constructions. Rephrasing such instances to emphasize direct action would add vitality and clarity., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The document admirably avoids personal pronoun use, maintaining a professional third-party tone throughout. Continued use of such structure is within best practices for resume writing.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=assistant: Hi is that PRIYANKАМОНАРАTRA?
user: hello
assistant: Times- of- India Group
, updated_at=2025-11-04T08:40:06.705895, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-11-04 08:40:06, id=4729f27e-6957-42ec-af1f-c8a115b844be, campaign_id=null, summary=The conversation begins with the agent greeting the user and confirming their identity as PRIYANKАMONARАTRA. The user responds with a simple "hello," and the agent identifies themselves as being from the Times of India Group., error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=12.7, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=200, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=171, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=29}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={gpt-4o-mini={output=50, input=28}, azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=37, input=2200}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization={output=50, input=28, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=gpt-4o-mini}, extraction=null, conversation={output=37, input=2200, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup={output=7, input=2361, provider_connected=false, provider=openai, model=gpt-4o-mini}}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-11-04 08:39:25, status=call-disconnected}
{created_at_str=2025-11-04 08:39:25, agent_id=db818162-fabe-4ac8-8a6a-c61223150a70, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-11-04T08:39:25.323383, scheduled_at=2025-11-04T08:39:25.323341, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+918124002995, provider_call_id=19da2ff5-cd81-4e04-82e7-cf079e22f63c, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+918124002995, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-11-04 13:58:55, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=PRIYANKАМОНАРАTRA, resume_review_id=6909b90118c34103789184eb, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=60, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume layout is mostly clear and structured logically, but could benefit from increased visual hierarchy to differentiate sections more effectively. The use of distinct headings, consistent formatting, and clearer separation between sections would improve overall readability., score=65, readability=The language in the resume is generally clear and straightforward, yet some sections feel cramped due to lack of spacing. Improving whitespace distribution between lines and sections would enhance readability and comprehension of key information., essentialSectionsPresence=All essential sections such as Summary, Experience, Education, and Skills are present, ensuring that the resume maintains a comprehensive framework. However, incorporating a well-structured Achievements or Certifications section could further enhance content value., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=ATS readability could be improved by incorporating more industry-specific keywords, particularly around technologies and tools. The layout largely supports ATS parsing, but optimizing keyword density and strategic placement would enhance appeal., score=62, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as names, positions, and contact information are well-structured to comply with ATS requirements. However, introducing more relevant keywords based on target roles would increase matching potential within ATS filters.}, impact={feedback=Impact in the resume is moderately demonstrated with some quantifiable achievements but could be more pronounced with specific metrics. Utilizing stronger, active verbs and diversifying language across accomplishments would considerably amplify impact., score=58, spellCheck=The resume appears to be free from spelling errors at a glance, indicating basic proofreading is in effect. However, a thorough review to catch minor grammatical inconsistencies would enhance professional presentation., bulletPointsUsage=The use of bullet points to list experience and accomplishments is solid, but they can be made more concise to highlight achievements more sharply. Ensuring each bullet captures a unique contribution without redundancy could improve clarity and impact., weakActionVerbs=A few weak verbs like 'Involved' and 'Support' undermine the dynamic nature of the roles; stronger action verbs should be employed. Replacing these with words like 'Spearheaded' or 'Facilitated' would elevate the descriptions' assertiveness., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=Quantifiable data such as 'improved quality by 20%' are sparsely included and should be more prevalent throughout to demonstrate specific successes. Adding more tangible outcomes would enhance the persuasiveness of the accomplishments presented., repetitionAvoidance=There is some repetition of action verbs like 'Collaborate' and 'Involved,' which could be reduced by utilizing a broader range of synonyms. Diversifying language would provide a fresher narrative across the role descriptions., accomplishmentLanguage=Language is generally focused on activities rather than results, needing a shift toward more accomplishment-oriented phrasing. Framing experiences around outcomes and results, rather than duties, would better showcase impact.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is of reasonable length considering the professional experience but contains overly long bullet points. Cutting superfluous details and focusing on highlights would improve crispness and keep content to the essentials., resumeLength=The resume is proportionate for a candidate with extensive experience but could benefit from tightening to prevent unnecessary verbosity. Striking a balance between thoroughness and precision would help maintain engagement., score=55, bulletPointsCount=The number of bullet points is adequate, but the points themselves need refinement to convey information concisely. Limiting each bullet point to a single, impactful idea would enhance clarity and focus., fillerWords=Various filler words and excess descriptions reduce the sharpness of the presented information. Eliminating redundant terms and streamlining language would increase the resume's effectiveness and sharpness., bulletPointLength=Bullet points are lengthy, often spanning over two lines, which can dilute the impact and reduce readability. Shortening bullet points to one line by focusing on key results or actions would improve information delivery., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume generally avoids excessive jargon and buzzwords, though more specific language could enrich descriptions. Adherence to stylistic details, including a few lapses, slightly hinders the professional presentation., score=60, buzzwordsCliches=The avoidance of clichés is appreciated, yet substituting vague terms like 'excellent' and 'expert' with concrete examples could enhance credibility. Providing instances or results instead of broad claims would lend authenticity., datesFormatting=Inconsistencies in date formatting across entries are identifiable, which might confuse chronology for readers. Ensuring uniformity, such as sticking consistently to 'Month Year' format across all sections, would tidy presentation., activeVoice=The resume successfully employs active voice in most sections, but some sentences slip into passive constructions. Rephrasing such instances to emphasize direct action would add vitality and clarity., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The document admirably avoids personal pronoun use, maintaining a professional third-party tone throughout. Continued use of such structure is within best practices for resume writing.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-11-04T08:39:49.776678, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-11-04 08:39:49, id=4729f27e-6957-42ec-af1f-c8a115b844be, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=29, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=29}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-11-04 08:39:25, status=in-progress}
{created_at_str=2025-11-04 08:39:25, agent_id=db818162-fabe-4ac8-8a6a-c61223150a70, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-11-04T08:39:25.323383, scheduled_at=2025-11-04T08:39:25.323341, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+918124002995, provider_call_id=19da2ff5-cd81-4e04-82e7-cf079e22f63c, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+918124002995, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-11-04 13:58:55, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=PRIYANKАМОНАРАTRA, resume_review_id=6909b90118c34103789184eb, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=60, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume layout is mostly clear and structured logically, but could benefit from increased visual hierarchy to differentiate sections more effectively. The use of distinct headings, consistent formatting, and clearer separation between sections would improve overall readability., score=65, readability=The language in the resume is generally clear and straightforward, yet some sections feel cramped due to lack of spacing. Improving whitespace distribution between lines and sections would enhance readability and comprehension of key information., essentialSectionsPresence=All essential sections such as Summary, Experience, Education, and Skills are present, ensuring that the resume maintains a comprehensive framework. However, incorporating a well-structured Achievements or Certifications section could further enhance content value., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=ATS readability could be improved by incorporating more industry-specific keywords, particularly around technologies and tools. The layout largely supports ATS parsing, but optimizing keyword density and strategic placement would enhance appeal., score=62, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as names, positions, and contact information are well-structured to comply with ATS requirements. However, introducing more relevant keywords based on target roles would increase matching potential within ATS filters.}, impact={feedback=Impact in the resume is moderately demonstrated with some quantifiable achievements but could be more pronounced with specific metrics. Utilizing stronger, active verbs and diversifying language across accomplishments would considerably amplify impact., score=58, spellCheck=The resume appears to be free from spelling errors at a glance, indicating basic proofreading is in effect. However, a thorough review to catch minor grammatical inconsistencies would enhance professional presentation., bulletPointsUsage=The use of bullet points to list experience and accomplishments is solid, but they can be made more concise to highlight achievements more sharply. Ensuring each bullet captures a unique contribution without redundancy could improve clarity and impact., weakActionVerbs=A few weak verbs like 'Involved' and 'Support' undermine the dynamic nature of the roles; stronger action verbs should be employed. Replacing these with words like 'Spearheaded' or 'Facilitated' would elevate the descriptions' assertiveness., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=Quantifiable data such as 'improved quality by 20%' are sparsely included and should be more prevalent throughout to demonstrate specific successes. Adding more tangible outcomes would enhance the persuasiveness of the accomplishments presented., repetitionAvoidance=There is some repetition of action verbs like 'Collaborate' and 'Involved,' which could be reduced by utilizing a broader range of synonyms. Diversifying language would provide a fresher narrative across the role descriptions., accomplishmentLanguage=Language is generally focused on activities rather than results, needing a shift toward more accomplishment-oriented phrasing. Framing experiences around outcomes and results, rather than duties, would better showcase impact.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is of reasonable length considering the professional experience but contains overly long bullet points. Cutting superfluous details and focusing on highlights would improve crispness and keep content to the essentials., resumeLength=The resume is proportionate for a candidate with extensive experience but could benefit from tightening to prevent unnecessary verbosity. Striking a balance between thoroughness and precision would help maintain engagement., score=55, bulletPointsCount=The number of bullet points is adequate, but the points themselves need refinement to convey information concisely. Limiting each bullet point to a single, impactful idea would enhance clarity and focus., fillerWords=Various filler words and excess descriptions reduce the sharpness of the presented information. Eliminating redundant terms and streamlining language would increase the resume's effectiveness and sharpness., bulletPointLength=Bullet points are lengthy, often spanning over two lines, which can dilute the impact and reduce readability. Shortening bullet points to one line by focusing on key results or actions would improve information delivery., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume generally avoids excessive jargon and buzzwords, though more specific language could enrich descriptions. Adherence to stylistic details, including a few lapses, slightly hinders the professional presentation., score=60, buzzwordsCliches=The avoidance of clichés is appreciated, yet substituting vague terms like 'excellent' and 'expert' with concrete examples could enhance credibility. Providing instances or results instead of broad claims would lend authenticity., datesFormatting=Inconsistencies in date formatting across entries are identifiable, which might confuse chronology for readers. Ensuring uniformity, such as sticking consistently to 'Month Year' format across all sections, would tidy presentation., activeVoice=The resume successfully employs active voice in most sections, but some sentences slip into passive constructions. Rephrasing such instances to emphasize direct action would add vitality and clarity., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The document admirably avoids personal pronoun use, maintaining a professional third-party tone throughout. Continued use of such structure is within best practices for resume writing.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-11-04T08:39:30.903962, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-11-04 08:39:30, id=4729f27e-6957-42ec-af1f-c8a115b844be, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=29, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=29}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-11-04 08:39:25, status=ringing}
{created_at_str=2025-11-04 08:39:25, agent_id=db818162-fabe-4ac8-8a6a-c61223150a70, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-11-04T08:39:25.323383, scheduled_at=2025-11-04T08:39:25.323341, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+918124002995, provider_call_id=19da2ff5-cd81-4e04-82e7-cf079e22f63c, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+918124002995, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-11-04 13:58:55, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=PRIYANKАМОНАРАTRA, resume_review_id=6909b90118c34103789184eb, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=60, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume layout is mostly clear and structured logically, but could benefit from increased visual hierarchy to differentiate sections more effectively. The use of distinct headings, consistent formatting, and clearer separation between sections would improve overall readability., score=65, readability=The language in the resume is generally clear and straightforward, yet some sections feel cramped due to lack of spacing. Improving whitespace distribution between lines and sections would enhance readability and comprehension of key information., essentialSectionsPresence=All essential sections such as Summary, Experience, Education, and Skills are present, ensuring that the resume maintains a comprehensive framework. However, incorporating a well-structured Achievements or Certifications section could further enhance content value., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=ATS readability could be improved by incorporating more industry-specific keywords, particularly around technologies and tools. The layout largely supports ATS parsing, but optimizing keyword density and strategic placement would enhance appeal., score=62, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as names, positions, and contact information are well-structured to comply with ATS requirements. However, introducing more relevant keywords based on target roles would increase matching potential within ATS filters.}, impact={feedback=Impact in the resume is moderately demonstrated with some quantifiable achievements but could be more pronounced with specific metrics. Utilizing stronger, active verbs and diversifying language across accomplishments would considerably amplify impact., score=58, spellCheck=The resume appears to be free from spelling errors at a glance, indicating basic proofreading is in effect. However, a thorough review to catch minor grammatical inconsistencies would enhance professional presentation., bulletPointsUsage=The use of bullet points to list experience and accomplishments is solid, but they can be made more concise to highlight achievements more sharply. Ensuring each bullet captures a unique contribution without redundancy could improve clarity and impact., weakActionVerbs=A few weak verbs like 'Involved' and 'Support' undermine the dynamic nature of the roles; stronger action verbs should be employed. Replacing these with words like 'Spearheaded' or 'Facilitated' would elevate the descriptions' assertiveness., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=Quantifiable data such as 'improved quality by 20%' are sparsely included and should be more prevalent throughout to demonstrate specific successes. Adding more tangible outcomes would enhance the persuasiveness of the accomplishments presented., repetitionAvoidance=There is some repetition of action verbs like 'Collaborate' and 'Involved,' which could be reduced by utilizing a broader range of synonyms. Diversifying language would provide a fresher narrative across the role descriptions., accomplishmentLanguage=Language is generally focused on activities rather than results, needing a shift toward more accomplishment-oriented phrasing. Framing experiences around outcomes and results, rather than duties, would better showcase impact.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is of reasonable length considering the professional experience but contains overly long bullet points. Cutting superfluous details and focusing on highlights would improve crispness and keep content to the essentials., resumeLength=The resume is proportionate for a candidate with extensive experience but could benefit from tightening to prevent unnecessary verbosity. Striking a balance between thoroughness and precision would help maintain engagement., score=55, bulletPointsCount=The number of bullet points is adequate, but the points themselves need refinement to convey information concisely. Limiting each bullet point to a single, impactful idea would enhance clarity and focus., fillerWords=Various filler words and excess descriptions reduce the sharpness of the presented information. Eliminating redundant terms and streamlining language would increase the resume's effectiveness and sharpness., bulletPointLength=Bullet points are lengthy, often spanning over two lines, which can dilute the impact and reduce readability. Shortening bullet points to one line by focusing on key results or actions would improve information delivery., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume generally avoids excessive jargon and buzzwords, though more specific language could enrich descriptions. Adherence to stylistic details, including a few lapses, slightly hinders the professional presentation., score=60, buzzwordsCliches=The avoidance of clichés is appreciated, yet substituting vague terms like 'excellent' and 'expert' with concrete examples could enhance credibility. Providing instances or results instead of broad claims would lend authenticity., datesFormatting=Inconsistencies in date formatting across entries are identifiable, which might confuse chronology for readers. Ensuring uniformity, such as sticking consistently to 'Month Year' format across all sections, would tidy presentation., activeVoice=The resume successfully employs active voice in most sections, but some sentences slip into passive constructions. Rephrasing such instances to emphasize direct action would add vitality and clarity., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The document admirably avoids personal pronoun use, maintaining a professional third-party tone throughout. Continued use of such structure is within best practices for resume writing.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-11-04T08:39:29.032942, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-11-04 08:39:29, id=4729f27e-6957-42ec-af1f-c8a115b844be, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=29, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=29}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-11-04 08:39:25, status=initiated}
Context Details
{recipient_phone_number=+918124002995, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-11-04 13:58:55, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=PRIYANKАМОНАРАTRA, resume_review_id=6909b90118c34103789184eb, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}