Dashboard

{created_at_str=2025-10-28 11:18:51, agent_id=db818162-fabe-4ac8-8a6a-c61223150a70, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-28T11:18:51.019889, scheduled_at=2025-10-28T11:18:51.019862, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919000233959, provider_call_id=842981c7-ee8f-4423-aa2f-a979a27590df, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=3020, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=Carrier, hangup_reason=Call recipient rejected}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919000233959, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-28 16:38:08, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=C, resume_review_id=6900a3d318c3410378905941, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=62, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume layout is generally structured but could benefit from better use of headers and section organization to improve clarity. Ample white space would enhance readability and visually separate sections., score=65, readability=The overall readability could be improved by aligning text properly and using consistent bulleting styles throughout the sections. Increasing font size slightly would also aid in better visual processing., essentialSectionsPresence=The essential sections such as Experience and Education are present, but the order of experiences isn't consistently in reverse chronological format. Clarifying this would ensure recent accomplishments are more apparent to employers., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=ATS readability is generally good with all major elements included, though keywords pertinent to each role could be infused more thoroughly. Attention to common industry-specific terminology would optimize ATS scoring., score=65, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements like name, contact, and education are well implemented, however, further judicious use of keywords relevant to HR expertise would improve ATS results. Logical structuring will also aid bot navigation.}, impact={feedback=The resume makes good use of bullet points to separate responsibilities, yet lacks quantifiable achievements that would highlight impact. Further defining outcomes can strengthen perceived accomplishments., score=60, spellCheck=Spelling and grammar appear accurate with some attention needed for regional language differences that may be present. Conducting a final review using a tool could assure consistency across sections., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used effectively to itemize responsibilities, however, they could better highlight specific achievements instead of duties alone. Adding a few specific quantifiable outcomes would enhance their strength., weakActionVerbs=Several weak verbs are present in the descriptions, which could be replaced with stronger alternatives such as 'achieved,' 'implemented,' or 'improved.' This shift can add vigour to descriptions., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=Achievements are not sufficiently quantified, which dampens the impact. Adding statistics, percentages or specific results gives substance to claims and provides tangible proof of success., repetitionAvoidance=There is some repetition of duties across different roles, which could be streamlined to prevent redundancy. Highlighting unique tasks or projects from each role would add differentiation., accomplishmentLanguage=A more accomplishment-focused narrative should be leveraged, focusing on the outcomes of actions. This orientation towards results can make the difference in perceived value to employers.}, crispness={feedback=The resume length is appropriate for the candidate's experience level, but some areas are verbose. Tightening up language can make descriptions more direct and powerful., resumeLength=Overall resume length is fine; however, it could be further condensed to focus on quality over quantity. This makes the document easier to digest, particularly for hiring managers with limited time., score=58, bulletPointsCount=The number of bullet points is sufficient; nevertheless, incorporating a concise selection for each point would enhance focus. Reducing and refining can lead to a crisper presentation., fillerWords=There are sections with filler words which dilute the impact of the statements. Removing unnecessary words can sharpen messages and clarify meaning., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points are overly detailed and would benefit from shortened, concise phrasing. This ensures that each point stands out, rather than getting lost in words., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The overall quality of the resume is adequate, yet benefits from cosmetic and structural enhancements. Increased specificity would also contribute to its effectiveness., score=62, buzzwordsCliches=Buzzwords are somewhat present and could be better supported by specific examples. Avoid general terms like 'result-oriented' or 'proficient' without backing contexts., datesFormatting=Date formats are relatively consistent but would benefit from uniformity across all sections. Consistent styling ensures clear navigation of timelines for the reader., activeVoice=The resume mostly contains active voice, which is commendable. However, there are instances where clearer subject-action is preferable to maintain engagement., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The usage of personal pronouns is minimized, contributing to a professional tone. Continued adherence to this style is recommended for maintaining an objective voice.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-28T11:19:53.043521, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-28 11:19:53, id=a5964d7d-e53c-4f7e-aafc-943a34ffbbc2, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=13, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=13}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-28 11:18:51, status=no-answer}

{created_at_str=2025-10-28 11:18:51, agent_id=db818162-fabe-4ac8-8a6a-c61223150a70, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-28T11:18:51.019889, scheduled_at=2025-10-28T11:18:51.019862, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919000233959, provider_call_id=842981c7-ee8f-4423-aa2f-a979a27590df, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919000233959, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-28 16:38:08, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=C, resume_review_id=6900a3d318c3410378905941, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=62, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume layout is generally structured but could benefit from better use of headers and section organization to improve clarity. Ample white space would enhance readability and visually separate sections., score=65, readability=The overall readability could be improved by aligning text properly and using consistent bulleting styles throughout the sections. Increasing font size slightly would also aid in better visual processing., essentialSectionsPresence=The essential sections such as Experience and Education are present, but the order of experiences isn't consistently in reverse chronological format. Clarifying this would ensure recent accomplishments are more apparent to employers., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=ATS readability is generally good with all major elements included, though keywords pertinent to each role could be infused more thoroughly. Attention to common industry-specific terminology would optimize ATS scoring., score=65, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements like name, contact, and education are well implemented, however, further judicious use of keywords relevant to HR expertise would improve ATS results. Logical structuring will also aid bot navigation.}, impact={feedback=The resume makes good use of bullet points to separate responsibilities, yet lacks quantifiable achievements that would highlight impact. Further defining outcomes can strengthen perceived accomplishments., score=60, spellCheck=Spelling and grammar appear accurate with some attention needed for regional language differences that may be present. Conducting a final review using a tool could assure consistency across sections., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used effectively to itemize responsibilities, however, they could better highlight specific achievements instead of duties alone. Adding a few specific quantifiable outcomes would enhance their strength., weakActionVerbs=Several weak verbs are present in the descriptions, which could be replaced with stronger alternatives such as 'achieved,' 'implemented,' or 'improved.' This shift can add vigour to descriptions., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=Achievements are not sufficiently quantified, which dampens the impact. Adding statistics, percentages or specific results gives substance to claims and provides tangible proof of success., repetitionAvoidance=There is some repetition of duties across different roles, which could be streamlined to prevent redundancy. Highlighting unique tasks or projects from each role would add differentiation., accomplishmentLanguage=A more accomplishment-focused narrative should be leveraged, focusing on the outcomes of actions. This orientation towards results can make the difference in perceived value to employers.}, crispness={feedback=The resume length is appropriate for the candidate's experience level, but some areas are verbose. Tightening up language can make descriptions more direct and powerful., resumeLength=Overall resume length is fine; however, it could be further condensed to focus on quality over quantity. This makes the document easier to digest, particularly for hiring managers with limited time., score=58, bulletPointsCount=The number of bullet points is sufficient; nevertheless, incorporating a concise selection for each point would enhance focus. Reducing and refining can lead to a crisper presentation., fillerWords=There are sections with filler words which dilute the impact of the statements. Removing unnecessary words can sharpen messages and clarify meaning., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points are overly detailed and would benefit from shortened, concise phrasing. This ensures that each point stands out, rather than getting lost in words., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The overall quality of the resume is adequate, yet benefits from cosmetic and structural enhancements. Increased specificity would also contribute to its effectiveness., score=62, buzzwordsCliches=Buzzwords are somewhat present and could be better supported by specific examples. Avoid general terms like 'result-oriented' or 'proficient' without backing contexts., datesFormatting=Date formats are relatively consistent but would benefit from uniformity across all sections. Consistent styling ensures clear navigation of timelines for the reader., activeVoice=The resume mostly contains active voice, which is commendable. However, there are instances where clearer subject-action is preferable to maintain engagement., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The usage of personal pronouns is minimized, contributing to a professional tone. Continued adherence to this style is recommended for maintaining an objective voice.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-28T11:18:57.314075, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-28 11:18:57, id=a5964d7d-e53c-4f7e-aafc-943a34ffbbc2, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=13, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=13}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-28 11:18:51, status=ringing}

{created_at_str=2025-10-28 11:18:51, agent_id=db818162-fabe-4ac8-8a6a-c61223150a70, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-28T11:18:51.019889, scheduled_at=2025-10-28T11:18:51.019862, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919000233959, provider_call_id=842981c7-ee8f-4423-aa2f-a979a27590df, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919000233959, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-28 16:38:08, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=C, resume_review_id=6900a3d318c3410378905941, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=62, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume layout is generally structured but could benefit from better use of headers and section organization to improve clarity. Ample white space would enhance readability and visually separate sections., score=65, readability=The overall readability could be improved by aligning text properly and using consistent bulleting styles throughout the sections. Increasing font size slightly would also aid in better visual processing., essentialSectionsPresence=The essential sections such as Experience and Education are present, but the order of experiences isn't consistently in reverse chronological format. Clarifying this would ensure recent accomplishments are more apparent to employers., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=ATS readability is generally good with all major elements included, though keywords pertinent to each role could be infused more thoroughly. Attention to common industry-specific terminology would optimize ATS scoring., score=65, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements like name, contact, and education are well implemented, however, further judicious use of keywords relevant to HR expertise would improve ATS results. Logical structuring will also aid bot navigation.}, impact={feedback=The resume makes good use of bullet points to separate responsibilities, yet lacks quantifiable achievements that would highlight impact. Further defining outcomes can strengthen perceived accomplishments., score=60, spellCheck=Spelling and grammar appear accurate with some attention needed for regional language differences that may be present. Conducting a final review using a tool could assure consistency across sections., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used effectively to itemize responsibilities, however, they could better highlight specific achievements instead of duties alone. Adding a few specific quantifiable outcomes would enhance their strength., weakActionVerbs=Several weak verbs are present in the descriptions, which could be replaced with stronger alternatives such as 'achieved,' 'implemented,' or 'improved.' This shift can add vigour to descriptions., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=Achievements are not sufficiently quantified, which dampens the impact. Adding statistics, percentages or specific results gives substance to claims and provides tangible proof of success., repetitionAvoidance=There is some repetition of duties across different roles, which could be streamlined to prevent redundancy. Highlighting unique tasks or projects from each role would add differentiation., accomplishmentLanguage=A more accomplishment-focused narrative should be leveraged, focusing on the outcomes of actions. This orientation towards results can make the difference in perceived value to employers.}, crispness={feedback=The resume length is appropriate for the candidate's experience level, but some areas are verbose. Tightening up language can make descriptions more direct and powerful., resumeLength=Overall resume length is fine; however, it could be further condensed to focus on quality over quantity. This makes the document easier to digest, particularly for hiring managers with limited time., score=58, bulletPointsCount=The number of bullet points is sufficient; nevertheless, incorporating a concise selection for each point would enhance focus. Reducing and refining can lead to a crisper presentation., fillerWords=There are sections with filler words which dilute the impact of the statements. Removing unnecessary words can sharpen messages and clarify meaning., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points are overly detailed and would benefit from shortened, concise phrasing. This ensures that each point stands out, rather than getting lost in words., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The overall quality of the resume is adequate, yet benefits from cosmetic and structural enhancements. Increased specificity would also contribute to its effectiveness., score=62, buzzwordsCliches=Buzzwords are somewhat present and could be better supported by specific examples. Avoid general terms like 'result-oriented' or 'proficient' without backing contexts., datesFormatting=Date formats are relatively consistent but would benefit from uniformity across all sections. Consistent styling ensures clear navigation of timelines for the reader., activeVoice=The resume mostly contains active voice, which is commendable. However, there are instances where clearer subject-action is preferable to maintain engagement., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The usage of personal pronouns is minimized, contributing to a professional tone. Continued adherence to this style is recommended for maintaining an objective voice.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-28T11:18:54.926626, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-28 11:18:54, id=a5964d7d-e53c-4f7e-aafc-943a34ffbbc2, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=13, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=13}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-28 11:18:51, status=initiated}