Dashboard

{created_at_str=2025-10-23 05:50:01, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=26.06, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=22.93, transcriber=0.0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=22.93}, llm=3.132, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0.0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0.02, extraction=0, conversation=2.265, hangup=0.847}}, created_at=2025-10-23T05:50:01.226135, scheduled_at=2025-10-23T05:50:01.226108, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919892553927, provider_call_id=fb4741fb-48b6-4fcb-b082-4619413402a1, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919892553927, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-23 11:09:35, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=Senthilkumar, resume_review_id=68f9bf6018c34103788f8184, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=59, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The overall layout of the resume is straightforward but lacks visual appeal, which can make it less engaging to review. Additionally, the document would benefit from more distinct section divisions to easily separate different content areas., score=60, readability=The resume maintains a plain format that can be read by most ATS systems, but lacks emphasis or formatting that makes important information stand out. The readability in terms of font and text structure is satisfactory, yet unconventional spacing could be streamlined for better clarity., essentialSectionsPresence=The resume includes essential sections such as Education, Experience, and Project Information, which are crucial for understanding the candidate's background. However, the absence of a dedicated Skills section makes it harder to quickly assess specific competencies., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume generally maintains structural simplicity which aids its parsing by ATS systems. However, slight adjustments with a more consistent use of industry-related keywords could improve its efficiency for automated systems., score=64, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=The core details like the candidate's name, contact information, and roles generally follow a straightforward format, which benefits ATS readability. Additional enhancement with more specific terminology could improve alignment with specific job descriptions.}, impact={feedback=The resume covers a range of experiences but fails to emphasize concrete outcomes or contributions for most roles. Including more metrics or achievements would bolster the impact of the work described., score=58, spellCheck=The document reflects reasonably good spellcheck control, with no glaring typographical errors. However, a final proofreading could eliminate minor errors that may have been overlooked, ensuring absolute accuracy., bulletPointsUsage=While the resume uses bullet points in several sections, the points provided are too lengthy and detailed without significant stand-out metrics. They would benefit from being more succinct and focused on key achievements., weakActionVerbs=There are limited weak action verbs in the resume; however, stronger, more dynamic word choices could still be introduced. Words like 'developed' and 'implemented' are used frequently; consider alternative words to vary tone., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=The document severely lacks quantifiable achievements, relying on task descriptions instead, which diminishes the overall persuasive impact. Consider adding percentages, numbers, or other metrics to highlight success stories., repetitionAvoidance=There is a noticeable repetition of similar tasks across multiple job roles, which could be condensed to demonstrate growth instead of redundancy. Distinctive accomplishments for each position should be emphasized instead., accomplishmentLanguage=The resume could be significantly improved with the integration of more accomplishment-oriented language, shifting focus away from job duties to professional highlights. Highlighting the result or change made by the actions would enhance the narrative.}, crispness={feedback=The document's length seems excessive given the lack of concise bullet points and formal organization in experiences described. Ensuring brevity and focus would sharpen the overall presentation., resumeLength=The resume's length appears overly long relative to the detail needed and could be condensed to better focus on the applicant's main achievements. Striving for clarity over mere delineation of every responsibility would read more professionally., score=55, bulletPointsCount=The bullet point count feels adequate but demands better specificity in detail provided. Consider utilizing fewer bullet points but enrich them with more meaningful content where possible., fillerWords=The resume suffers from the inclusion of several filler phrases that add length but little value or information. Eliminating unnecessary adjectives and focusing on direct statements will help improve the document's crispness., bulletPointLength=Entries are generally too long and try to contain too much information, leading to cluttered sections. Shortening bullet points and moving towards tighter, results-driven language would improve the texture of the resume., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=Stylistically, the resume lacks a degree of polished professionalism due to inconsistent formatting and overused general terms. Adjustments in tone and structure could markedly increase overall quality., score=58, buzzwordsCliches=The frequent use of terms seen as generic buzzwords ('excellent business communication skills', 'constantly transforming') detracts from the professionalism of the resume. Replacing these with more tailored language about specific instances or examples would provide depth., datesFormatting=The formatting of dates is somewhat inconsistent across different entries, not using a unified format, which may cause confusion. It is advisable to maintain a consistent style such as 'Month, Year' for all roles to streamline information., activeVoice=There's an adequate use of active voice, though in certain instances, there could be improvements to enhance clarity and focus. Shifting further away from passive constructions would make achievements feel more engaging., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The resume generally avoids personal pronouns effectively, a good practice for this kind of document. Keeping it in the third person ensures a professional tone throughout.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=assistant: Hi is that Senthilkumar?
user:  yeah
assistant:  Hi Senthilkumar, this is Anita from Outspark – a career services platform, part of the Times-of-India Group. Is it a good time to connect with you right now?
user:  yeah tell me
assistant:  I see you just checked your resume score with us today. Are you looking for a job change right now or just updating your resume?
user:  yeah
assistant:  Great! We have your experience
user:  i'm looking yeah i'm looking
assistant:  We have your experience as ten years, is that correct?
user:  yeah
assistant:   What kind of roles are you targeting, Senthilkumar?
user:  so c seven w p f developer
assistant:   Got it, targeting C seven
user:  it's a dot net framework
assistant:   Thanks for clarifying, Senthilkumar. Are you aware of ATS, the applicant tracking system, and how it impacts your resume?
user:  just i'm checking that we died
assistant:   No worries! ATS is software that helps HR shortlist profiles. If your resume isn’t ATS-friendly, it might get rejected before reaching HR. Makes sense?
user:  okay
assistant:  I see your resume score was fifty nine out of one hundred. Anything below eighty is poor for ATS. So even if you’re qualified, ATS might be rejecting your resume. Are you getting enough relevant interview calls with this resume?
user:  no but i will fix myself that's not an issue
assistant:   I get that, Senthilkumar, but fixing it yourself can be tricky. Are you customizing your resume for every job or using the same one for all?
user:  yeah i can understand but what is the user for that
assistant:   The ATS filters resumes using keywords from the job description. If your resume lacks these, it won’t reach recruiters. That’s why customization is key. Want me to explain more?
user:  no need i think it is paid services correct
assistant:   Yes, Senthilkumar
user:  it's okay no problem i will check with myself if i have any doubts
assistant:   I
user:  or if i work and i'm working for that i will come with you
assistant:   Totally get it, Senthilkumar. But remember, a strong ATS-friendly resume can open doors faster. Don’t wait too long—your dream job might be just one upgrade away!
user:  okay give me some time i will check it okay
assistant:  Sure, Senthilkumar! Take your time, but don’t wait too long. I’ll be here when you’re ready to boost your resume!
user:  will check it
assistant:   Perfect! Just reach out whenever you want that resume upgrade. I’m here to help you shine!
user:  sure sure i will check it
assistant:   Awesome, Senthilkumar! Looking forward to helping you land those interviews soon. Take care!
assistant: Call will now disconnect
, updated_at=2025-10-23T05:53:31.040746, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-23 05:53:31, id=bde7b451-c494-45f7-ae52-6047d624a932, campaign_id=null, summary=In the conversation, Anita from Outspark, a career services platform, contacted Senthilkumar to discuss his resume and job search. Senthilkumar confirmed he has ten years of experience and is targeting roles as a C# developer within the .NET framework. Anita explained the importance of having an ATS-friendly resume, noting that his current resume score was 59 out of 100, which is considered poor for passing through applicant tracking systems. Senthilkumar acknowledged the need to improve his resume but expressed confidence in handling it himself. Anita encouraged him to customize his resume for each job application and offered her assistance if needed. Senthilkumar agreed to check on his resume and mentioned he would reach out if he had any doubts. The call ended with Anita encouraging him to take action soon to enhance his job prospects., error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=180.6, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=2317, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=2293, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=24}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={gpt-4o-mini={output=165, input=640}, azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=514, input=54553}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization={output=165, input=640, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=gpt-4o-mini}, extraction=null, conversation={output=514, input=54553, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup={output=119, input=56502, provider_connected=false, provider=openai, model=gpt-4o-mini}}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-23 05:50:01, status=call-disconnected}

{created_at_str=2025-10-23 05:50:01, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-23T05:50:01.226135, scheduled_at=2025-10-23T05:50:01.226108, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919892553927, provider_call_id=fb4741fb-48b6-4fcb-b082-4619413402a1, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919892553927, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-23 11:09:35, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=Senthilkumar, resume_review_id=68f9bf6018c34103788f8184, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=59, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The overall layout of the resume is straightforward but lacks visual appeal, which can make it less engaging to review. Additionally, the document would benefit from more distinct section divisions to easily separate different content areas., score=60, readability=The resume maintains a plain format that can be read by most ATS systems, but lacks emphasis or formatting that makes important information stand out. The readability in terms of font and text structure is satisfactory, yet unconventional spacing could be streamlined for better clarity., essentialSectionsPresence=The resume includes essential sections such as Education, Experience, and Project Information, which are crucial for understanding the candidate's background. However, the absence of a dedicated Skills section makes it harder to quickly assess specific competencies., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume generally maintains structural simplicity which aids its parsing by ATS systems. However, slight adjustments with a more consistent use of industry-related keywords could improve its efficiency for automated systems., score=64, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=The core details like the candidate's name, contact information, and roles generally follow a straightforward format, which benefits ATS readability. Additional enhancement with more specific terminology could improve alignment with specific job descriptions.}, impact={feedback=The resume covers a range of experiences but fails to emphasize concrete outcomes or contributions for most roles. Including more metrics or achievements would bolster the impact of the work described., score=58, spellCheck=The document reflects reasonably good spellcheck control, with no glaring typographical errors. However, a final proofreading could eliminate minor errors that may have been overlooked, ensuring absolute accuracy., bulletPointsUsage=While the resume uses bullet points in several sections, the points provided are too lengthy and detailed without significant stand-out metrics. They would benefit from being more succinct and focused on key achievements., weakActionVerbs=There are limited weak action verbs in the resume; however, stronger, more dynamic word choices could still be introduced. Words like 'developed' and 'implemented' are used frequently; consider alternative words to vary tone., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=The document severely lacks quantifiable achievements, relying on task descriptions instead, which diminishes the overall persuasive impact. Consider adding percentages, numbers, or other metrics to highlight success stories., repetitionAvoidance=There is a noticeable repetition of similar tasks across multiple job roles, which could be condensed to demonstrate growth instead of redundancy. Distinctive accomplishments for each position should be emphasized instead., accomplishmentLanguage=The resume could be significantly improved with the integration of more accomplishment-oriented language, shifting focus away from job duties to professional highlights. Highlighting the result or change made by the actions would enhance the narrative.}, crispness={feedback=The document's length seems excessive given the lack of concise bullet points and formal organization in experiences described. Ensuring brevity and focus would sharpen the overall presentation., resumeLength=The resume's length appears overly long relative to the detail needed and could be condensed to better focus on the applicant's main achievements. Striving for clarity over mere delineation of every responsibility would read more professionally., score=55, bulletPointsCount=The bullet point count feels adequate but demands better specificity in detail provided. Consider utilizing fewer bullet points but enrich them with more meaningful content where possible., fillerWords=The resume suffers from the inclusion of several filler phrases that add length but little value or information. Eliminating unnecessary adjectives and focusing on direct statements will help improve the document's crispness., bulletPointLength=Entries are generally too long and try to contain too much information, leading to cluttered sections. Shortening bullet points and moving towards tighter, results-driven language would improve the texture of the resume., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=Stylistically, the resume lacks a degree of polished professionalism due to inconsistent formatting and overused general terms. Adjustments in tone and structure could markedly increase overall quality., score=58, buzzwordsCliches=The frequent use of terms seen as generic buzzwords ('excellent business communication skills', 'constantly transforming') detracts from the professionalism of the resume. Replacing these with more tailored language about specific instances or examples would provide depth., datesFormatting=The formatting of dates is somewhat inconsistent across different entries, not using a unified format, which may cause confusion. It is advisable to maintain a consistent style such as 'Month, Year' for all roles to streamline information., activeVoice=There's an adequate use of active voice, though in certain instances, there could be improvements to enhance clarity and focus. Shifting further away from passive constructions would make achievements feel more engaging., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The resume generally avoids personal pronouns effectively, a good practice for this kind of document. Keeping it in the third person ensures a professional tone throughout.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-23T05:50:17.088878, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-23 05:50:17, id=bde7b451-c494-45f7-ae52-6047d624a932, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=24, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=24}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-23 05:50:01, status=in-progress}

{created_at_str=2025-10-23 05:50:01, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-23T05:50:01.226135, scheduled_at=2025-10-23T05:50:01.226108, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919892553927, provider_call_id=fb4741fb-48b6-4fcb-b082-4619413402a1, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919892553927, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-23 11:09:35, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=Senthilkumar, resume_review_id=68f9bf6018c34103788f8184, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=59, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The overall layout of the resume is straightforward but lacks visual appeal, which can make it less engaging to review. Additionally, the document would benefit from more distinct section divisions to easily separate different content areas., score=60, readability=The resume maintains a plain format that can be read by most ATS systems, but lacks emphasis or formatting that makes important information stand out. The readability in terms of font and text structure is satisfactory, yet unconventional spacing could be streamlined for better clarity., essentialSectionsPresence=The resume includes essential sections such as Education, Experience, and Project Information, which are crucial for understanding the candidate's background. However, the absence of a dedicated Skills section makes it harder to quickly assess specific competencies., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume generally maintains structural simplicity which aids its parsing by ATS systems. However, slight adjustments with a more consistent use of industry-related keywords could improve its efficiency for automated systems., score=64, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=The core details like the candidate's name, contact information, and roles generally follow a straightforward format, which benefits ATS readability. Additional enhancement with more specific terminology could improve alignment with specific job descriptions.}, impact={feedback=The resume covers a range of experiences but fails to emphasize concrete outcomes or contributions for most roles. Including more metrics or achievements would bolster the impact of the work described., score=58, spellCheck=The document reflects reasonably good spellcheck control, with no glaring typographical errors. However, a final proofreading could eliminate minor errors that may have been overlooked, ensuring absolute accuracy., bulletPointsUsage=While the resume uses bullet points in several sections, the points provided are too lengthy and detailed without significant stand-out metrics. They would benefit from being more succinct and focused on key achievements., weakActionVerbs=There are limited weak action verbs in the resume; however, stronger, more dynamic word choices could still be introduced. Words like 'developed' and 'implemented' are used frequently; consider alternative words to vary tone., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=The document severely lacks quantifiable achievements, relying on task descriptions instead, which diminishes the overall persuasive impact. Consider adding percentages, numbers, or other metrics to highlight success stories., repetitionAvoidance=There is a noticeable repetition of similar tasks across multiple job roles, which could be condensed to demonstrate growth instead of redundancy. Distinctive accomplishments for each position should be emphasized instead., accomplishmentLanguage=The resume could be significantly improved with the integration of more accomplishment-oriented language, shifting focus away from job duties to professional highlights. Highlighting the result or change made by the actions would enhance the narrative.}, crispness={feedback=The document's length seems excessive given the lack of concise bullet points and formal organization in experiences described. Ensuring brevity and focus would sharpen the overall presentation., resumeLength=The resume's length appears overly long relative to the detail needed and could be condensed to better focus on the applicant's main achievements. Striving for clarity over mere delineation of every responsibility would read more professionally., score=55, bulletPointsCount=The bullet point count feels adequate but demands better specificity in detail provided. Consider utilizing fewer bullet points but enrich them with more meaningful content where possible., fillerWords=The resume suffers from the inclusion of several filler phrases that add length but little value or information. Eliminating unnecessary adjectives and focusing on direct statements will help improve the document's crispness., bulletPointLength=Entries are generally too long and try to contain too much information, leading to cluttered sections. Shortening bullet points and moving towards tighter, results-driven language would improve the texture of the resume., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=Stylistically, the resume lacks a degree of polished professionalism due to inconsistent formatting and overused general terms. Adjustments in tone and structure could markedly increase overall quality., score=58, buzzwordsCliches=The frequent use of terms seen as generic buzzwords ('excellent business communication skills', 'constantly transforming') detracts from the professionalism of the resume. Replacing these with more tailored language about specific instances or examples would provide depth., datesFormatting=The formatting of dates is somewhat inconsistent across different entries, not using a unified format, which may cause confusion. It is advisable to maintain a consistent style such as 'Month, Year' for all roles to streamline information., activeVoice=There's an adequate use of active voice, though in certain instances, there could be improvements to enhance clarity and focus. Shifting further away from passive constructions would make achievements feel more engaging., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The resume generally avoids personal pronouns effectively, a good practice for this kind of document. Keeping it in the third person ensures a professional tone throughout.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-23T05:50:05.99011, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-23 05:50:05, id=bde7b451-c494-45f7-ae52-6047d624a932, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=24, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=24}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-23 05:50:01, status=ringing}

{created_at_str=2025-10-23 05:50:01, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-23T05:50:01.226135, scheduled_at=2025-10-23T05:50:01.226108, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919892553927, provider_call_id=fb4741fb-48b6-4fcb-b082-4619413402a1, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919892553927, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-23 11:09:35, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=Senthilkumar, resume_review_id=68f9bf6018c34103788f8184, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=59, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The overall layout of the resume is straightforward but lacks visual appeal, which can make it less engaging to review. Additionally, the document would benefit from more distinct section divisions to easily separate different content areas., score=60, readability=The resume maintains a plain format that can be read by most ATS systems, but lacks emphasis or formatting that makes important information stand out. The readability in terms of font and text structure is satisfactory, yet unconventional spacing could be streamlined for better clarity., essentialSectionsPresence=The resume includes essential sections such as Education, Experience, and Project Information, which are crucial for understanding the candidate's background. However, the absence of a dedicated Skills section makes it harder to quickly assess specific competencies., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume generally maintains structural simplicity which aids its parsing by ATS systems. However, slight adjustments with a more consistent use of industry-related keywords could improve its efficiency for automated systems., score=64, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=The core details like the candidate's name, contact information, and roles generally follow a straightforward format, which benefits ATS readability. Additional enhancement with more specific terminology could improve alignment with specific job descriptions.}, impact={feedback=The resume covers a range of experiences but fails to emphasize concrete outcomes or contributions for most roles. Including more metrics or achievements would bolster the impact of the work described., score=58, spellCheck=The document reflects reasonably good spellcheck control, with no glaring typographical errors. However, a final proofreading could eliminate minor errors that may have been overlooked, ensuring absolute accuracy., bulletPointsUsage=While the resume uses bullet points in several sections, the points provided are too lengthy and detailed without significant stand-out metrics. They would benefit from being more succinct and focused on key achievements., weakActionVerbs=There are limited weak action verbs in the resume; however, stronger, more dynamic word choices could still be introduced. Words like 'developed' and 'implemented' are used frequently; consider alternative words to vary tone., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=The document severely lacks quantifiable achievements, relying on task descriptions instead, which diminishes the overall persuasive impact. Consider adding percentages, numbers, or other metrics to highlight success stories., repetitionAvoidance=There is a noticeable repetition of similar tasks across multiple job roles, which could be condensed to demonstrate growth instead of redundancy. Distinctive accomplishments for each position should be emphasized instead., accomplishmentLanguage=The resume could be significantly improved with the integration of more accomplishment-oriented language, shifting focus away from job duties to professional highlights. Highlighting the result or change made by the actions would enhance the narrative.}, crispness={feedback=The document's length seems excessive given the lack of concise bullet points and formal organization in experiences described. Ensuring brevity and focus would sharpen the overall presentation., resumeLength=The resume's length appears overly long relative to the detail needed and could be condensed to better focus on the applicant's main achievements. Striving for clarity over mere delineation of every responsibility would read more professionally., score=55, bulletPointsCount=The bullet point count feels adequate but demands better specificity in detail provided. Consider utilizing fewer bullet points but enrich them with more meaningful content where possible., fillerWords=The resume suffers from the inclusion of several filler phrases that add length but little value or information. Eliminating unnecessary adjectives and focusing on direct statements will help improve the document's crispness., bulletPointLength=Entries are generally too long and try to contain too much information, leading to cluttered sections. Shortening bullet points and moving towards tighter, results-driven language would improve the texture of the resume., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=Stylistically, the resume lacks a degree of polished professionalism due to inconsistent formatting and overused general terms. Adjustments in tone and structure could markedly increase overall quality., score=58, buzzwordsCliches=The frequent use of terms seen as generic buzzwords ('excellent business communication skills', 'constantly transforming') detracts from the professionalism of the resume. Replacing these with more tailored language about specific instances or examples would provide depth., datesFormatting=The formatting of dates is somewhat inconsistent across different entries, not using a unified format, which may cause confusion. It is advisable to maintain a consistent style such as 'Month, Year' for all roles to streamline information., activeVoice=There's an adequate use of active voice, though in certain instances, there could be improvements to enhance clarity and focus. Shifting further away from passive constructions would make achievements feel more engaging., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The resume generally avoids personal pronouns effectively, a good practice for this kind of document. Keeping it in the third person ensures a professional tone throughout.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-23T05:50:04.657958, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-23 05:50:04, id=bde7b451-c494-45f7-ae52-6047d624a932, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=24, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=24}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-23 05:50:01, status=initiated}