Dashboard

{created_at_str=2025-10-15 06:58:18, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=1.81, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=1.47, transcriber=0.169, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=1.47}, llm=0.16699999999999998, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0.169}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0.004, extraction=0, conversation=0.119, hangup=0.044}}, created_at=2025-10-15T06:58:18.438858, scheduled_at=2025-10-15T06:58:18.438822, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919443925493, provider_call_id=7024554b-73c4-4d84-ad76-85e678a7a74f, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919443925493, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-15 12:17:26, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=S., resume_review_id=68ef43219f941c720e710621, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=63.8, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume presents all the essential sections clearly but could benefit from a more structured layout to enhance readability. The inclusion of headings like Experience and Education is good but they should be in reverse chronological order to emphasize recent achievements., score=66, readability=While the educational and publication details are thorough, the document's two-column format and dense text can impede readability. Simplifying or reforming the layout with more spacing or bullet points could improve its readability., essentialSectionsPresence=Essential sections such as Experience, Education, and Publications are present, providing a comprehensive overview of the applicant's academic background. However, the absence of a professional summary or objective is noticeable and could provide context to the reader., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume's structure is compatible with most ATS systems thanks to clear headers and formatting. However, ensuring consistent keyword optimization can boost its ATS compatibility further., score=69, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Crucial information like contact details and education is well-placed for ATS recognition. Enhancing keyword usage related to specific roles and industries would increase its searchability within ATS systems.}, impact={feedback=The impact of the resume could be greater with more quantifiable achievements and use of strong action verbs. Current entries are informative but lack specific results or impacts that help the applicant stand out., score=62, spellCheck=The document adheres to good spelling standards with no noticeable errors. Maintaining this level of attention to detail is important for professional presentation., bulletPointsUsage=There is minimal use of bullet points, especially in sections where impact and achievements could be highlighted. Introducing bullet points in the Experience section to list responsibilities and achievements could enhance clarity and impact., weakActionVerbs=The resume currently relies on weak action verbs which do not convey the full extent of the applicant's accomplishments. Stronger verbs like 'spearheaded,' 'optimized,' or 'accelerated' would better articulate contributions., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=The resume does not utilize quantifiable achievements. Incorporating metrics, such as 'improved efficiency by X%', would demonstrate the applicant's tangible impact more clearly., repetitionAvoidance=There is a repetitive use of certain industry-specific terms, which might dilute their effectiveness. By varying language and avoiding repetition, the applicant can maintain engagement., accomplishmentLanguage=The language in the resume generally outlines tasks rather than accomplishments. Refocusing on results-driven narratives can highlight the applicant's proactive contributions and capabilities.}, crispness={feedback=The resume's length is extensive and could be condensed to emphasize key points more clearly. Conciseness and succinctness are lacking, particularly in narrative-heavy sections., resumeLength=The resume is notably long, primarily due to extensive publication and achievement listings. Summarizing older publications or awards, focusing on recent, relevant experiences could improve focus., score=58, bulletPointsCount=There is a minimal use of bullet points, contributing to dense paragraphs. Increasing bullet points especially in Experience where achievements could be succinctly highlighted is recommended., fillerWords=There is a presence of filler words and redundant phrases that should be trimmed to enhance crispness. Eliminating these can help in creating a more powerful resume with sharper primary content., bulletPointLength=For the few existing bullet points, some are overly lengthy and could be broken down into more digestible segments. Brief and pointed statements are more effective., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=There is a noticeable use of academic buzzwords, which could be replaced with more precise descriptions to enhance clarity. Consistency in date formatting is good but could be more visually integrated with the content., score=64, buzzwordsCliches=The resume leans heavily on academic and technical jargon, which may not always translate to a broader audience. Opting for clearer, more universally understood language would make the resume more accessible., datesFormatting=Dates are consistently formatted, which aids in the professional presentation of the document. However, integrating them seamlessly with experience details would aid in better chronological readability., activeVoice=While the resume is largely devoid of passive voice, transitioning more sentences into active voice could enhance engagement and demonstrate ownership of achievements., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The absence of personal pronouns is well managed, as per resume norms which prefer impersonal language. This keeps the resume formal and focused on professional competencies.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=assistant: Hi is that S.?
user:  hello
assistant:  Hi S., this is Anita from Outspark – a career services platform, part of the Times-of-India Group. Is
, updated_at=2025-10-15T06:58:48.255819, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-15 06:58:48, id=b3e882bb-215a-475e-960d-1c7027c6b1c0, campaign_id=null, summary=The conversation begins with the agent, Anita, greeting the user, S. She introduces herself as a representative from Outspark, a career services platform associated with the Times-of-India Group. The call is likely related to career services or assistance., error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=11.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=10.999937, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=10.999937, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=161, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=147, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=14}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={gpt-4o-mini={output=49, input=42}, azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=36, input=2835}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization={output=49, input=42, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=gpt-4o-mini}, extraction=null, conversation={output=36, input=2835, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup={output=7, input=2961, provider_connected=false, provider=openai, model=gpt-4o-mini}}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-15 06:58:18, status=call-disconnected}

{created_at_str=2025-10-15 06:58:18, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-15T06:58:18.438858, scheduled_at=2025-10-15T06:58:18.438822, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919443925493, provider_call_id=7024554b-73c4-4d84-ad76-85e678a7a74f, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919443925493, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-15 12:17:26, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=S., resume_review_id=68ef43219f941c720e710621, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=63.8, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume presents all the essential sections clearly but could benefit from a more structured layout to enhance readability. The inclusion of headings like Experience and Education is good but they should be in reverse chronological order to emphasize recent achievements., score=66, readability=While the educational and publication details are thorough, the document's two-column format and dense text can impede readability. Simplifying or reforming the layout with more spacing or bullet points could improve its readability., essentialSectionsPresence=Essential sections such as Experience, Education, and Publications are present, providing a comprehensive overview of the applicant's academic background. However, the absence of a professional summary or objective is noticeable and could provide context to the reader., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume's structure is compatible with most ATS systems thanks to clear headers and formatting. However, ensuring consistent keyword optimization can boost its ATS compatibility further., score=69, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Crucial information like contact details and education is well-placed for ATS recognition. Enhancing keyword usage related to specific roles and industries would increase its searchability within ATS systems.}, impact={feedback=The impact of the resume could be greater with more quantifiable achievements and use of strong action verbs. Current entries are informative but lack specific results or impacts that help the applicant stand out., score=62, spellCheck=The document adheres to good spelling standards with no noticeable errors. Maintaining this level of attention to detail is important for professional presentation., bulletPointsUsage=There is minimal use of bullet points, especially in sections where impact and achievements could be highlighted. Introducing bullet points in the Experience section to list responsibilities and achievements could enhance clarity and impact., weakActionVerbs=The resume currently relies on weak action verbs which do not convey the full extent of the applicant's accomplishments. Stronger verbs like 'spearheaded,' 'optimized,' or 'accelerated' would better articulate contributions., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=The resume does not utilize quantifiable achievements. Incorporating metrics, such as 'improved efficiency by X%', would demonstrate the applicant's tangible impact more clearly., repetitionAvoidance=There is a repetitive use of certain industry-specific terms, which might dilute their effectiveness. By varying language and avoiding repetition, the applicant can maintain engagement., accomplishmentLanguage=The language in the resume generally outlines tasks rather than accomplishments. Refocusing on results-driven narratives can highlight the applicant's proactive contributions and capabilities.}, crispness={feedback=The resume's length is extensive and could be condensed to emphasize key points more clearly. Conciseness and succinctness are lacking, particularly in narrative-heavy sections., resumeLength=The resume is notably long, primarily due to extensive publication and achievement listings. Summarizing older publications or awards, focusing on recent, relevant experiences could improve focus., score=58, bulletPointsCount=There is a minimal use of bullet points, contributing to dense paragraphs. Increasing bullet points especially in Experience where achievements could be succinctly highlighted is recommended., fillerWords=There is a presence of filler words and redundant phrases that should be trimmed to enhance crispness. Eliminating these can help in creating a more powerful resume with sharper primary content., bulletPointLength=For the few existing bullet points, some are overly lengthy and could be broken down into more digestible segments. Brief and pointed statements are more effective., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=There is a noticeable use of academic buzzwords, which could be replaced with more precise descriptions to enhance clarity. Consistency in date formatting is good but could be more visually integrated with the content., score=64, buzzwordsCliches=The resume leans heavily on academic and technical jargon, which may not always translate to a broader audience. Opting for clearer, more universally understood language would make the resume more accessible., datesFormatting=Dates are consistently formatted, which aids in the professional presentation of the document. However, integrating them seamlessly with experience details would aid in better chronological readability., activeVoice=While the resume is largely devoid of passive voice, transitioning more sentences into active voice could enhance engagement and demonstrate ownership of achievements., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The absence of personal pronouns is well managed, as per resume norms which prefer impersonal language. This keeps the resume formal and focused on professional competencies.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-15T06:58:28.629145, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-15 06:58:28, id=b3e882bb-215a-475e-960d-1c7027c6b1c0, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=14, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=14}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-15 06:58:18, status=in-progress}

{created_at_str=2025-10-15 06:58:18, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-15T06:58:18.438858, scheduled_at=2025-10-15T06:58:18.438822, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919443925493, provider_call_id=7024554b-73c4-4d84-ad76-85e678a7a74f, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919443925493, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-15 12:17:26, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=S., resume_review_id=68ef43219f941c720e710621, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=63.8, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume presents all the essential sections clearly but could benefit from a more structured layout to enhance readability. The inclusion of headings like Experience and Education is good but they should be in reverse chronological order to emphasize recent achievements., score=66, readability=While the educational and publication details are thorough, the document's two-column format and dense text can impede readability. Simplifying or reforming the layout with more spacing or bullet points could improve its readability., essentialSectionsPresence=Essential sections such as Experience, Education, and Publications are present, providing a comprehensive overview of the applicant's academic background. However, the absence of a professional summary or objective is noticeable and could provide context to the reader., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume's structure is compatible with most ATS systems thanks to clear headers and formatting. However, ensuring consistent keyword optimization can boost its ATS compatibility further., score=69, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Crucial information like contact details and education is well-placed for ATS recognition. Enhancing keyword usage related to specific roles and industries would increase its searchability within ATS systems.}, impact={feedback=The impact of the resume could be greater with more quantifiable achievements and use of strong action verbs. Current entries are informative but lack specific results or impacts that help the applicant stand out., score=62, spellCheck=The document adheres to good spelling standards with no noticeable errors. Maintaining this level of attention to detail is important for professional presentation., bulletPointsUsage=There is minimal use of bullet points, especially in sections where impact and achievements could be highlighted. Introducing bullet points in the Experience section to list responsibilities and achievements could enhance clarity and impact., weakActionVerbs=The resume currently relies on weak action verbs which do not convey the full extent of the applicant's accomplishments. Stronger verbs like 'spearheaded,' 'optimized,' or 'accelerated' would better articulate contributions., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=The resume does not utilize quantifiable achievements. Incorporating metrics, such as 'improved efficiency by X%', would demonstrate the applicant's tangible impact more clearly., repetitionAvoidance=There is a repetitive use of certain industry-specific terms, which might dilute their effectiveness. By varying language and avoiding repetition, the applicant can maintain engagement., accomplishmentLanguage=The language in the resume generally outlines tasks rather than accomplishments. Refocusing on results-driven narratives can highlight the applicant's proactive contributions and capabilities.}, crispness={feedback=The resume's length is extensive and could be condensed to emphasize key points more clearly. Conciseness and succinctness are lacking, particularly in narrative-heavy sections., resumeLength=The resume is notably long, primarily due to extensive publication and achievement listings. Summarizing older publications or awards, focusing on recent, relevant experiences could improve focus., score=58, bulletPointsCount=There is a minimal use of bullet points, contributing to dense paragraphs. Increasing bullet points especially in Experience where achievements could be succinctly highlighted is recommended., fillerWords=There is a presence of filler words and redundant phrases that should be trimmed to enhance crispness. Eliminating these can help in creating a more powerful resume with sharper primary content., bulletPointLength=For the few existing bullet points, some are overly lengthy and could be broken down into more digestible segments. Brief and pointed statements are more effective., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=There is a noticeable use of academic buzzwords, which could be replaced with more precise descriptions to enhance clarity. Consistency in date formatting is good but could be more visually integrated with the content., score=64, buzzwordsCliches=The resume leans heavily on academic and technical jargon, which may not always translate to a broader audience. Opting for clearer, more universally understood language would make the resume more accessible., datesFormatting=Dates are consistently formatted, which aids in the professional presentation of the document. However, integrating them seamlessly with experience details would aid in better chronological readability., activeVoice=While the resume is largely devoid of passive voice, transitioning more sentences into active voice could enhance engagement and demonstrate ownership of achievements., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The absence of personal pronouns is well managed, as per resume norms which prefer impersonal language. This keeps the resume formal and focused on professional competencies.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-15T06:58:22.763865, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-15 06:58:22, id=b3e882bb-215a-475e-960d-1c7027c6b1c0, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=14, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=14}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-15 06:58:18, status=ringing}

{created_at_str=2025-10-15 06:58:18, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-15T06:58:18.438858, scheduled_at=2025-10-15T06:58:18.438822, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919443925493, provider_call_id=7024554b-73c4-4d84-ad76-85e678a7a74f, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919443925493, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-15 12:17:26, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=S., resume_review_id=68ef43219f941c720e710621, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=63.8, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume presents all the essential sections clearly but could benefit from a more structured layout to enhance readability. The inclusion of headings like Experience and Education is good but they should be in reverse chronological order to emphasize recent achievements., score=66, readability=While the educational and publication details are thorough, the document's two-column format and dense text can impede readability. Simplifying or reforming the layout with more spacing or bullet points could improve its readability., essentialSectionsPresence=Essential sections such as Experience, Education, and Publications are present, providing a comprehensive overview of the applicant's academic background. However, the absence of a professional summary or objective is noticeable and could provide context to the reader., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume's structure is compatible with most ATS systems thanks to clear headers and formatting. However, ensuring consistent keyword optimization can boost its ATS compatibility further., score=69, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Crucial information like contact details and education is well-placed for ATS recognition. Enhancing keyword usage related to specific roles and industries would increase its searchability within ATS systems.}, impact={feedback=The impact of the resume could be greater with more quantifiable achievements and use of strong action verbs. Current entries are informative but lack specific results or impacts that help the applicant stand out., score=62, spellCheck=The document adheres to good spelling standards with no noticeable errors. Maintaining this level of attention to detail is important for professional presentation., bulletPointsUsage=There is minimal use of bullet points, especially in sections where impact and achievements could be highlighted. Introducing bullet points in the Experience section to list responsibilities and achievements could enhance clarity and impact., weakActionVerbs=The resume currently relies on weak action verbs which do not convey the full extent of the applicant's accomplishments. Stronger verbs like 'spearheaded,' 'optimized,' or 'accelerated' would better articulate contributions., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=The resume does not utilize quantifiable achievements. Incorporating metrics, such as 'improved efficiency by X%', would demonstrate the applicant's tangible impact more clearly., repetitionAvoidance=There is a repetitive use of certain industry-specific terms, which might dilute their effectiveness. By varying language and avoiding repetition, the applicant can maintain engagement., accomplishmentLanguage=The language in the resume generally outlines tasks rather than accomplishments. Refocusing on results-driven narratives can highlight the applicant's proactive contributions and capabilities.}, crispness={feedback=The resume's length is extensive and could be condensed to emphasize key points more clearly. Conciseness and succinctness are lacking, particularly in narrative-heavy sections., resumeLength=The resume is notably long, primarily due to extensive publication and achievement listings. Summarizing older publications or awards, focusing on recent, relevant experiences could improve focus., score=58, bulletPointsCount=There is a minimal use of bullet points, contributing to dense paragraphs. Increasing bullet points especially in Experience where achievements could be succinctly highlighted is recommended., fillerWords=There is a presence of filler words and redundant phrases that should be trimmed to enhance crispness. Eliminating these can help in creating a more powerful resume with sharper primary content., bulletPointLength=For the few existing bullet points, some are overly lengthy and could be broken down into more digestible segments. Brief and pointed statements are more effective., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=There is a noticeable use of academic buzzwords, which could be replaced with more precise descriptions to enhance clarity. Consistency in date formatting is good but could be more visually integrated with the content., score=64, buzzwordsCliches=The resume leans heavily on academic and technical jargon, which may not always translate to a broader audience. Opting for clearer, more universally understood language would make the resume more accessible., datesFormatting=Dates are consistently formatted, which aids in the professional presentation of the document. However, integrating them seamlessly with experience details would aid in better chronological readability., activeVoice=While the resume is largely devoid of passive voice, transitioning more sentences into active voice could enhance engagement and demonstrate ownership of achievements., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The absence of personal pronouns is well managed, as per resume norms which prefer impersonal language. This keeps the resume formal and focused on professional competencies.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-15T06:58:19.856336, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-15 06:58:19, id=b3e882bb-215a-475e-960d-1c7027c6b1c0, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=14, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=14}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-15 06:58:18, status=initiated}