Dashboard

{created_at_str=2025-10-14 07:28:10, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=17.48, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=13.69, transcriber=1.874, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0, conversation=13.69}, llm=1.9149999999999998, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=1.874}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0.014, extraction=0, conversation=1.38, hangup=0.521}}, created_at=2025-10-14T07:28:10.270118, scheduled_at=2025-10-14T07:28:10.270093, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919966924488, provider_call_id=17be8e28-4dcc-4aa0-b15b-22122de2c2d6, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919966924488, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-14 12:48:00, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=P., resume_review_id=68edf8f218c34103788df84a, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=56, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume's layout lacks a clear structure, making it difficult to follow and locate essential information quickly. Important sections such as Technical Skills are not consistently formatted, affecting readability and flow., score=58, readability=The resume has a poor visual hierarchy, making it challenging to discern different sections due to inconsistent font usage and spacing. Improving alignment and the use of headers can greatly enhance readability throughout the document., essentialSectionsPresence=Main sections such as Work Experience and Education are present but not clearly labeled or organized in a logical order. The resume could benefit from removing irrelevant sections, like Address for Communication, and adding a succinct Summary or Objective., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume format and structure pose challenges for ATS parsing, notably due to inconsistent sectioning and terminology. Enhancing keyword relevance and ensuring a simple structure can improve ATS compatibility., score=60, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as job titles and company names are often obscured by inconsistent formatting, hindering ATS systems from capturing critical data. Streamlining the format and adding relevant industry keywords will aid in better ATS parsing.}, impact={feedback=The impact of the resume is weakened by the lack of quantifiable achievements and extensive repetition. Strong, specific action verbs are rarely used, reducing the strength of the accomplishments listed., score=55, spellCheck=There are several errors in capitalization and punctuation throughout the text, impacting the professionalism of the resume. A thorough spell check and proofreading exercise is recommended., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used inconsistently across sections, often lacking uniformity in style and length. They should clearly outline accomplishments, not just duties, using crisp and action-oriented language., weakActionVerbs=Many sentences start with weak verbs that fail to convey strong action, e.g., 'working' instead of 'led' or 'managed'. Replacing these with assertive verbs would bolster the narrative., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=There is minimal use of quantifiable data to showcase the candidate's achievements. Providing specific figures, such as percentages or number improvements, would greatly enhance the perceived impact of the work done., repetitionAvoidance=There is noticeable repetition of job roles without clear distinction of responsibilities or achievements. Each role should highlight unique accomplishments or skills gained to avoid redundancy., accomplishmentLanguage=The resume lacks language that reflects outcome-driven actions or accomplishments, focusing too much on generic job descriptions. A shift towards detailing results or impacts made in past roles would be beneficial.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is overly lengthy and contains unnecessary content that dilutes its impact. Bullet points are often too verbose and need to be concise to maintain the reader's attention., resumeLength=Currently, the resume extends beyond two pages without sufficient justification through high-impact achievements. Condensing sections and removing filler content can lead to a sharper, more engaging document., score=52, bulletPointsCount=An excessive number of bullet points per section overwhelms the reader, diluting key achievements. Limiting bullet points to a maximum of 5-6 per role would help maintain focus on significant contributions., fillerWords=There is noticeable use of filler words and verbose statements that do not add value. Eliminating these will not only make the resume more concise but also more impactful., bulletPointLength=Bullet points are often long sentences that reduce their effectiveness. Breaking them into shorter, specific statements backed by evidence will ensure clarity and impact., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume suffers from the overuse of buzzwords and lacks the specificity needed to stand out. Structure and tone inconsistencies, especially in formatting and language, lower the quality., score=55, buzzwordsCliches=Buzzwords such as 'dynamic' and 'opportunity' are overused, detracting from the professional tone. Replace these with specific, concrete examples that highlight personal contributions and skills., datesFormatting=Date formatting is inconsistent across the document, which can confuse timelines for potential employers. Ensuring dates follow the same format (e.g., MM/YYYY) improves clarity and professionalism., activeVoice=The use of active voice is inconsistent, with passive constructions diluting the actions taken. Shifting consistently to active voice can enhance the directness and strength of the achievements listed., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=Personal pronouns are avoided, which is typical, but the resume lacks a personal tone due to its overly mechanical language. Striking a balance between formality and personal impact is advisable.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=assistant: Hi is that P.?
user:  hello
assistant:  Hi P., this is Anita from Outspark. Is it a good time to connect?
user:  yeah
assistant:  Great! I see you checked your resume score with us today. Are you looking for a job change right now or just updating your resume?
user:  yeah job change
assistant:  Got it, P. You have about ten years of experience, right? What kind of roles are you targeting?
user:  aml kyc transaction monitoring sir
assistant:   Thanks for sharing, P. Are you aware of ATS, the applicant tracking system, and how it
user:  yeah yeah yeah
assistant:   Perfect! ATS helps HR shortlist profiles. If your resume isn’t ATS-friendly, it might get rejected before reaching HR. Makes sense?
user:  yeah
assistant:   Your resume scored fifty six out of one hundred. Anything below eighty is poor for ATS. So, even if qualified, ATS might be rejecting your resume. Are you getting enough relevant interview calls?
user:  not probably
assistant:   Are you customizing your resume for each job or using the same one for all applications?
user:  seven four hours
assistant:   Sorry, P., could you please repeat that? I didn’t quite catch it.
user:  no i don't think they're putting the same
assistant:   Hmm, that might be why calls are low. Your resume’s layout and keywords aren’t ATS-friendly, so it’s likely getting rejected. Does that make sense?
user:  yes
assistant:    Your resume needs to act like a magnet, highlighting skills and achievements for the roles you want. Without the right keywords, recruiters won’t see you, even if you’re perfect. Agree?
user:  okay yeah
assistant:    So, two things: your resume might miss ATS keywords, and your job search method might not be the best. Want me to explain more?
, updated_at=2025-10-14T07:30:35.082463, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-14 07:30:35, id=a10337a0-4ec1-4c98-b151-db9cd8763ab3, campaign_id=null, summary=In the conversation, Anita from Outspark contacted the user, P., to discuss their resume and job search. P. confirmed they are looking for a job change, specifically in AML KYC transaction monitoring, and has about ten years of experience. Anita informed P. that their resume scored 56 out of 100 on the ATS (Applicant Tracking System), indicating it is not ATS-friendly, which could be the reason for not receiving enough interview calls. P. acknowledged that they are not customizing their resume for each application. Anita emphasized the importance of using the right keywords and layout to improve visibility to recruiters and offered to explain further., error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=122.3, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=122.199936, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=122.199936, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=1369, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=1369, welcome_message_cache=true, welcome_message_characters=0}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={gpt-4o-mini={output=126, input=406}, azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=303, input=33308}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization={output=126, input=406, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=gpt-4o-mini}, extraction=null, conversation={output=303, input=33308, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup={output=77, input=34622, provider_connected=false, provider=openai, model=gpt-4o-mini}}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-14 07:28:10, status=call-disconnected}

{created_at_str=2025-10-14 07:28:10, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-14T07:28:10.270118, scheduled_at=2025-10-14T07:28:10.270093, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919966924488, provider_call_id=17be8e28-4dcc-4aa0-b15b-22122de2c2d6, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919966924488, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-14 12:48:00, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=P., resume_review_id=68edf8f218c34103788df84a, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=56, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume's layout lacks a clear structure, making it difficult to follow and locate essential information quickly. Important sections such as Technical Skills are not consistently formatted, affecting readability and flow., score=58, readability=The resume has a poor visual hierarchy, making it challenging to discern different sections due to inconsistent font usage and spacing. Improving alignment and the use of headers can greatly enhance readability throughout the document., essentialSectionsPresence=Main sections such as Work Experience and Education are present but not clearly labeled or organized in a logical order. The resume could benefit from removing irrelevant sections, like Address for Communication, and adding a succinct Summary or Objective., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume format and structure pose challenges for ATS parsing, notably due to inconsistent sectioning and terminology. Enhancing keyword relevance and ensuring a simple structure can improve ATS compatibility., score=60, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as job titles and company names are often obscured by inconsistent formatting, hindering ATS systems from capturing critical data. Streamlining the format and adding relevant industry keywords will aid in better ATS parsing.}, impact={feedback=The impact of the resume is weakened by the lack of quantifiable achievements and extensive repetition. Strong, specific action verbs are rarely used, reducing the strength of the accomplishments listed., score=55, spellCheck=There are several errors in capitalization and punctuation throughout the text, impacting the professionalism of the resume. A thorough spell check and proofreading exercise is recommended., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used inconsistently across sections, often lacking uniformity in style and length. They should clearly outline accomplishments, not just duties, using crisp and action-oriented language., weakActionVerbs=Many sentences start with weak verbs that fail to convey strong action, e.g., 'working' instead of 'led' or 'managed'. Replacing these with assertive verbs would bolster the narrative., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=There is minimal use of quantifiable data to showcase the candidate's achievements. Providing specific figures, such as percentages or number improvements, would greatly enhance the perceived impact of the work done., repetitionAvoidance=There is noticeable repetition of job roles without clear distinction of responsibilities or achievements. Each role should highlight unique accomplishments or skills gained to avoid redundancy., accomplishmentLanguage=The resume lacks language that reflects outcome-driven actions or accomplishments, focusing too much on generic job descriptions. A shift towards detailing results or impacts made in past roles would be beneficial.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is overly lengthy and contains unnecessary content that dilutes its impact. Bullet points are often too verbose and need to be concise to maintain the reader's attention., resumeLength=Currently, the resume extends beyond two pages without sufficient justification through high-impact achievements. Condensing sections and removing filler content can lead to a sharper, more engaging document., score=52, bulletPointsCount=An excessive number of bullet points per section overwhelms the reader, diluting key achievements. Limiting bullet points to a maximum of 5-6 per role would help maintain focus on significant contributions., fillerWords=There is noticeable use of filler words and verbose statements that do not add value. Eliminating these will not only make the resume more concise but also more impactful., bulletPointLength=Bullet points are often long sentences that reduce their effectiveness. Breaking them into shorter, specific statements backed by evidence will ensure clarity and impact., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume suffers from the overuse of buzzwords and lacks the specificity needed to stand out. Structure and tone inconsistencies, especially in formatting and language, lower the quality., score=55, buzzwordsCliches=Buzzwords such as 'dynamic' and 'opportunity' are overused, detracting from the professional tone. Replace these with specific, concrete examples that highlight personal contributions and skills., datesFormatting=Date formatting is inconsistent across the document, which can confuse timelines for potential employers. Ensuring dates follow the same format (e.g., MM/YYYY) improves clarity and professionalism., activeVoice=The use of active voice is inconsistent, with passive constructions diluting the actions taken. Shifting consistently to active voice can enhance the directness and strength of the achievements listed., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=Personal pronouns are avoided, which is typical, but the resume lacks a personal tone due to its overly mechanical language. Striking a balance between formality and personal impact is advisable.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-14T07:28:21.433359, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-14 07:28:21, id=a10337a0-4ec1-4c98-b151-db9cd8763ab3, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=0, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=true, welcome_message_characters=0}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-14 07:28:10, status=in-progress}

{created_at_str=2025-10-14 07:28:10, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-14T07:28:10.270118, scheduled_at=2025-10-14T07:28:10.270093, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919966924488, provider_call_id=17be8e28-4dcc-4aa0-b15b-22122de2c2d6, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919966924488, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-14 12:48:00, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=P., resume_review_id=68edf8f218c34103788df84a, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=56, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume's layout lacks a clear structure, making it difficult to follow and locate essential information quickly. Important sections such as Technical Skills are not consistently formatted, affecting readability and flow., score=58, readability=The resume has a poor visual hierarchy, making it challenging to discern different sections due to inconsistent font usage and spacing. Improving alignment and the use of headers can greatly enhance readability throughout the document., essentialSectionsPresence=Main sections such as Work Experience and Education are present but not clearly labeled or organized in a logical order. The resume could benefit from removing irrelevant sections, like Address for Communication, and adding a succinct Summary or Objective., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume format and structure pose challenges for ATS parsing, notably due to inconsistent sectioning and terminology. Enhancing keyword relevance and ensuring a simple structure can improve ATS compatibility., score=60, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as job titles and company names are often obscured by inconsistent formatting, hindering ATS systems from capturing critical data. Streamlining the format and adding relevant industry keywords will aid in better ATS parsing.}, impact={feedback=The impact of the resume is weakened by the lack of quantifiable achievements and extensive repetition. Strong, specific action verbs are rarely used, reducing the strength of the accomplishments listed., score=55, spellCheck=There are several errors in capitalization and punctuation throughout the text, impacting the professionalism of the resume. A thorough spell check and proofreading exercise is recommended., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used inconsistently across sections, often lacking uniformity in style and length. They should clearly outline accomplishments, not just duties, using crisp and action-oriented language., weakActionVerbs=Many sentences start with weak verbs that fail to convey strong action, e.g., 'working' instead of 'led' or 'managed'. Replacing these with assertive verbs would bolster the narrative., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=There is minimal use of quantifiable data to showcase the candidate's achievements. Providing specific figures, such as percentages or number improvements, would greatly enhance the perceived impact of the work done., repetitionAvoidance=There is noticeable repetition of job roles without clear distinction of responsibilities or achievements. Each role should highlight unique accomplishments or skills gained to avoid redundancy., accomplishmentLanguage=The resume lacks language that reflects outcome-driven actions or accomplishments, focusing too much on generic job descriptions. A shift towards detailing results or impacts made in past roles would be beneficial.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is overly lengthy and contains unnecessary content that dilutes its impact. Bullet points are often too verbose and need to be concise to maintain the reader's attention., resumeLength=Currently, the resume extends beyond two pages without sufficient justification through high-impact achievements. Condensing sections and removing filler content can lead to a sharper, more engaging document., score=52, bulletPointsCount=An excessive number of bullet points per section overwhelms the reader, diluting key achievements. Limiting bullet points to a maximum of 5-6 per role would help maintain focus on significant contributions., fillerWords=There is noticeable use of filler words and verbose statements that do not add value. Eliminating these will not only make the resume more concise but also more impactful., bulletPointLength=Bullet points are often long sentences that reduce their effectiveness. Breaking them into shorter, specific statements backed by evidence will ensure clarity and impact., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume suffers from the overuse of buzzwords and lacks the specificity needed to stand out. Structure and tone inconsistencies, especially in formatting and language, lower the quality., score=55, buzzwordsCliches=Buzzwords such as 'dynamic' and 'opportunity' are overused, detracting from the professional tone. Replace these with specific, concrete examples that highlight personal contributions and skills., datesFormatting=Date formatting is inconsistent across the document, which can confuse timelines for potential employers. Ensuring dates follow the same format (e.g., MM/YYYY) improves clarity and professionalism., activeVoice=The use of active voice is inconsistent, with passive constructions diluting the actions taken. Shifting consistently to active voice can enhance the directness and strength of the achievements listed., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=Personal pronouns are avoided, which is typical, but the resume lacks a personal tone due to its overly mechanical language. Striking a balance between formality and personal impact is advisable.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-14T07:28:14.279503, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-14 07:28:14, id=a10337a0-4ec1-4c98-b151-db9cd8763ab3, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=0, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=true, welcome_message_characters=0}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-14 07:28:10, status=ringing}

{created_at_str=2025-10-14 07:28:10, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-14T07:28:10.270118, scheduled_at=2025-10-14T07:28:10.270093, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919966924488, provider_call_id=17be8e28-4dcc-4aa0-b15b-22122de2c2d6, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919966924488, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-14 12:48:00, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=P., resume_review_id=68edf8f218c34103788df84a, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=56, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume's layout lacks a clear structure, making it difficult to follow and locate essential information quickly. Important sections such as Technical Skills are not consistently formatted, affecting readability and flow., score=58, readability=The resume has a poor visual hierarchy, making it challenging to discern different sections due to inconsistent font usage and spacing. Improving alignment and the use of headers can greatly enhance readability throughout the document., essentialSectionsPresence=Main sections such as Work Experience and Education are present but not clearly labeled or organized in a logical order. The resume could benefit from removing irrelevant sections, like Address for Communication, and adding a succinct Summary or Objective., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume format and structure pose challenges for ATS parsing, notably due to inconsistent sectioning and terminology. Enhancing keyword relevance and ensuring a simple structure can improve ATS compatibility., score=60, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as job titles and company names are often obscured by inconsistent formatting, hindering ATS systems from capturing critical data. Streamlining the format and adding relevant industry keywords will aid in better ATS parsing.}, impact={feedback=The impact of the resume is weakened by the lack of quantifiable achievements and extensive repetition. Strong, specific action verbs are rarely used, reducing the strength of the accomplishments listed., score=55, spellCheck=There are several errors in capitalization and punctuation throughout the text, impacting the professionalism of the resume. A thorough spell check and proofreading exercise is recommended., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used inconsistently across sections, often lacking uniformity in style and length. They should clearly outline accomplishments, not just duties, using crisp and action-oriented language., weakActionVerbs=Many sentences start with weak verbs that fail to convey strong action, e.g., 'working' instead of 'led' or 'managed'. Replacing these with assertive verbs would bolster the narrative., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=There is minimal use of quantifiable data to showcase the candidate's achievements. Providing specific figures, such as percentages or number improvements, would greatly enhance the perceived impact of the work done., repetitionAvoidance=There is noticeable repetition of job roles without clear distinction of responsibilities or achievements. Each role should highlight unique accomplishments or skills gained to avoid redundancy., accomplishmentLanguage=The resume lacks language that reflects outcome-driven actions or accomplishments, focusing too much on generic job descriptions. A shift towards detailing results or impacts made in past roles would be beneficial.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is overly lengthy and contains unnecessary content that dilutes its impact. Bullet points are often too verbose and need to be concise to maintain the reader's attention., resumeLength=Currently, the resume extends beyond two pages without sufficient justification through high-impact achievements. Condensing sections and removing filler content can lead to a sharper, more engaging document., score=52, bulletPointsCount=An excessive number of bullet points per section overwhelms the reader, diluting key achievements. Limiting bullet points to a maximum of 5-6 per role would help maintain focus on significant contributions., fillerWords=There is noticeable use of filler words and verbose statements that do not add value. Eliminating these will not only make the resume more concise but also more impactful., bulletPointLength=Bullet points are often long sentences that reduce their effectiveness. Breaking them into shorter, specific statements backed by evidence will ensure clarity and impact., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume suffers from the overuse of buzzwords and lacks the specificity needed to stand out. Structure and tone inconsistencies, especially in formatting and language, lower the quality., score=55, buzzwordsCliches=Buzzwords such as 'dynamic' and 'opportunity' are overused, detracting from the professional tone. Replace these with specific, concrete examples that highlight personal contributions and skills., datesFormatting=Date formatting is inconsistent across the document, which can confuse timelines for potential employers. Ensuring dates follow the same format (e.g., MM/YYYY) improves clarity and professionalism., activeVoice=The use of active voice is inconsistent, with passive constructions diluting the actions taken. Shifting consistently to active voice can enhance the directness and strength of the achievements listed., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=Personal pronouns are avoided, which is typical, but the resume lacks a personal tone due to its overly mechanical language. Striking a balance between formality and personal impact is advisable.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-14T07:28:13.160751, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-14 07:28:13, id=a10337a0-4ec1-4c98-b151-db9cd8763ab3, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=0, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=true, welcome_message_characters=0}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-14 07:28:10, status=initiated}