Dashboard

{created_at_str=2025-10-12 07:17:10, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=6.08, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=5.05, transcriber=0.0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=5.05}, llm=1.029, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0.0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0.007, extraction=0, conversation=0.742, hangup=0.28}}, created_at=2025-10-12T07:17:10.889424, scheduled_at=2025-10-12T07:17:10.889384, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+917013841616, provider_call_id=bf9a1639-43fe-43eb-a47c-1e88cd3836a8, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+917013841616, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-12 12:36:25, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=ROUTHU, resume_review_id=68eb53479f941c720e706fbb, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=62.8, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume follows a structured layout with clear sections, making it easily searchable and readable. However, there's room for improvement in creating a more visually distinct separation between sections to enhance quick scanning., score=68, readability=The font choice and size aid in the readability of the document, though more consistent spacing would improve clarity further. Headings are used effectively, but the addition of dividers or a different formatting style could enhance readability even more., essentialSectionsPresence=All essential sections, such as experience, education, and skills, are present and arranged correctly. Redundancy is avoided, although it could benefit from a bit more detail in the Education section stating specific courses or projects that relate to the job., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume is well-prepared for ATS parsing, with clearly defined sections and relevant technical keywords included. Greater attention to keyword diversity and critical skills could enhance its ATS resonance further., score=66, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=All key elements necessary for ATS readability such as full name, most recent employer, and contact details are clearly positioned and easy to extract. Structuring of content supports good ATS parsing, although integrating role-specific keywords could optimize its compatibility.}, impact={feedback=The resume quantitatively showcases achievements very well, which adds significant strength to the impact section. However, there is room to further diversify action verbs used, and avoid slight repetition noted across different sections., score=61, spellCheck=The resume appears free of spelling errors, underlining attention to detail. A quick review on grammar consistency can ensure there are no overlooked typos or structural issues., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used effectively to break down and highlight key responsibilities and achievements, making them engage quickly. However, consistency in the style of bullet points would bring more uniformity., weakActionVerbs=Most of the action verbs are strong, leading with a results-oriented approach, but some could still be replaced with more vibrant verbs to showcase abilities more dynamically. Consider swapping 'developed' or 'handled' with more precise verbs like 'engineered' or 'executed.', scale=100, quantifyingImpact=Achievements are generally well quantified, using data to demonstrate contributions clearly, a strong point of this resume. Nevertheless, additional quantifiable data in all sections according to standardized measures could increase impact further., repetitionAvoidance=There is a slight repetition of duties and tasks in the work experience section, which can be edited to highlight unique achievements. Rephrasing or bringing new insights, especially between the most recent roles, would contribute distinctiveness., accomplishmentLanguage=The resume successfully utilizes accomplishment-oriented language, clearly emphasizing results and contributions. However, a heavier emphasis on 'how' these accomplishments were achieved could paint a fuller picture for potential employers.}, crispness={feedback=The resume struggles slightly with crispness, evident in somewhat elongated bullet points and details that could be more concise. There's a need to decrease reliance on filler words and phrases to enhance the resume's crispness effectively., resumeLength=The length of the resume is mostly adequate given the experience level, but a more concise presentation of older roles could streamline it further. Maintaining focus chiefly on the most relevant, recent experiences usually adds more weight., score=55, bulletPointsCount=The overall count of bullet points is acceptable; however, reducing them in earlier positions can sharpen focus on recent, relevant accomplishments. A strategic reduction will highlight the most significant achievements without redundancy., fillerWords=Filler words periodically detract from the core message of achievements, suggesting potential refinement. A closer edit to eliminate unnecessary words and tighten descriptions would foster better efficiency in communication., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points extend too long, diminishing their potential impact and clarity. Breaking longer points into two or more concise ones would improve delivery, ideally aiming for brevity without losing detail., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=Stylistically, the resume aligns fairly well with guidelines, benefiting from clear language and mostly consistent formatting. Addressing minor stylistic inconsistencies could elevate the overall quality greatly., score=64, buzzwordsCliches=The language generally tries to avoid cliched terms; however, sections still fall back on buzzwords like 'expert.' Swapping these for more transparent, role-specific achievements could bolster credibility., datesFormatting=Date formatting is consistent and clear throughout the resume, aiding in easy chronology understanding. Maintaining this consistency is beneficial and contributes positively to readability., activeVoice=Active voice is used consistently, leading to a direct and compelling presentation of experience and skills. This approach effectively highlights achievements and contributions in a persuasive manner., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The resume appropriately avoids personal pronouns, keeping a professional tone that aligns with expectations. Continuing this practice ensures the resume remains focused on skills and impact, not the individual.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=assistant: Hi is that ROUTHU?
user:  hello
assistant:  Hi ROUTHU, this is Anita from Outspark – a career services platform, part of the Times-of-India Group. Is it a good time to connect with you right now?
user:  no actually
assistant:  No worries! What
user:  i'm at the outside so
assistant:  Got it! What time can I call you back today or tomorrow?
user:  tomorrow morning guys available to speak
assistant:   Perfect! I’ll call you tomorrow morning then. What time works best for you?
user:  thank you
assistant:   You’re welcome, ROUTHU
user:  after your name
assistant:   It’s Anita, ROUTHU. Looking forward to our chat tomorrow!
assistant: Call will now disconnect
, updated_at=2025-10-12T07:18:10.894281, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-12 07:18:10, id=ebf1867e-8ff9-424c-9ef7-b65026eadfd7, campaign_id=null, summary=In the conversation, Anita from Outspark, a career services platform, reached out to ROUTHU. ROUTHU was unable to talk at the moment as he was outside. Anita asked for a suitable time to call back, and ROUTHU suggested tomorrow morning. Anita confirmed the arrangement and provided her name before the call ended., error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=44.2, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=523, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=505, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=18}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={gpt-4o-mini={output=67, input=174}, azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=121, input=18086}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization={output=67, input=174, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=gpt-4o-mini}, extraction=null, conversation={output=121, input=18086, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup={output=42, input=18704, provider_connected=false, provider=openai, model=gpt-4o-mini}}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-12 07:17:10, status=call-disconnected}

{created_at_str=2025-10-12 07:17:10, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-12T07:17:10.889424, scheduled_at=2025-10-12T07:17:10.889384, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+917013841616, provider_call_id=bf9a1639-43fe-43eb-a47c-1e88cd3836a8, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+917013841616, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-12 12:36:25, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=ROUTHU, resume_review_id=68eb53479f941c720e706fbb, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=62.8, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume follows a structured layout with clear sections, making it easily searchable and readable. However, there's room for improvement in creating a more visually distinct separation between sections to enhance quick scanning., score=68, readability=The font choice and size aid in the readability of the document, though more consistent spacing would improve clarity further. Headings are used effectively, but the addition of dividers or a different formatting style could enhance readability even more., essentialSectionsPresence=All essential sections, such as experience, education, and skills, are present and arranged correctly. Redundancy is avoided, although it could benefit from a bit more detail in the Education section stating specific courses or projects that relate to the job., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume is well-prepared for ATS parsing, with clearly defined sections and relevant technical keywords included. Greater attention to keyword diversity and critical skills could enhance its ATS resonance further., score=66, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=All key elements necessary for ATS readability such as full name, most recent employer, and contact details are clearly positioned and easy to extract. Structuring of content supports good ATS parsing, although integrating role-specific keywords could optimize its compatibility.}, impact={feedback=The resume quantitatively showcases achievements very well, which adds significant strength to the impact section. However, there is room to further diversify action verbs used, and avoid slight repetition noted across different sections., score=61, spellCheck=The resume appears free of spelling errors, underlining attention to detail. A quick review on grammar consistency can ensure there are no overlooked typos or structural issues., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used effectively to break down and highlight key responsibilities and achievements, making them engage quickly. However, consistency in the style of bullet points would bring more uniformity., weakActionVerbs=Most of the action verbs are strong, leading with a results-oriented approach, but some could still be replaced with more vibrant verbs to showcase abilities more dynamically. Consider swapping 'developed' or 'handled' with more precise verbs like 'engineered' or 'executed.', scale=100, quantifyingImpact=Achievements are generally well quantified, using data to demonstrate contributions clearly, a strong point of this resume. Nevertheless, additional quantifiable data in all sections according to standardized measures could increase impact further., repetitionAvoidance=There is a slight repetition of duties and tasks in the work experience section, which can be edited to highlight unique achievements. Rephrasing or bringing new insights, especially between the most recent roles, would contribute distinctiveness., accomplishmentLanguage=The resume successfully utilizes accomplishment-oriented language, clearly emphasizing results and contributions. However, a heavier emphasis on 'how' these accomplishments were achieved could paint a fuller picture for potential employers.}, crispness={feedback=The resume struggles slightly with crispness, evident in somewhat elongated bullet points and details that could be more concise. There's a need to decrease reliance on filler words and phrases to enhance the resume's crispness effectively., resumeLength=The length of the resume is mostly adequate given the experience level, but a more concise presentation of older roles could streamline it further. Maintaining focus chiefly on the most relevant, recent experiences usually adds more weight., score=55, bulletPointsCount=The overall count of bullet points is acceptable; however, reducing them in earlier positions can sharpen focus on recent, relevant accomplishments. A strategic reduction will highlight the most significant achievements without redundancy., fillerWords=Filler words periodically detract from the core message of achievements, suggesting potential refinement. A closer edit to eliminate unnecessary words and tighten descriptions would foster better efficiency in communication., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points extend too long, diminishing their potential impact and clarity. Breaking longer points into two or more concise ones would improve delivery, ideally aiming for brevity without losing detail., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=Stylistically, the resume aligns fairly well with guidelines, benefiting from clear language and mostly consistent formatting. Addressing minor stylistic inconsistencies could elevate the overall quality greatly., score=64, buzzwordsCliches=The language generally tries to avoid cliched terms; however, sections still fall back on buzzwords like 'expert.' Swapping these for more transparent, role-specific achievements could bolster credibility., datesFormatting=Date formatting is consistent and clear throughout the resume, aiding in easy chronology understanding. Maintaining this consistency is beneficial and contributes positively to readability., activeVoice=Active voice is used consistently, leading to a direct and compelling presentation of experience and skills. This approach effectively highlights achievements and contributions in a persuasive manner., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The resume appropriately avoids personal pronouns, keeping a professional tone that aligns with expectations. Continuing this practice ensures the resume remains focused on skills and impact, not the individual.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-12T07:17:17.821511, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-12 07:17:17, id=ebf1867e-8ff9-424c-9ef7-b65026eadfd7, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=18, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=18}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-12 07:17:10, status=in-progress}

{created_at_str=2025-10-12 07:17:10, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-12T07:17:10.889424, scheduled_at=2025-10-12T07:17:10.889384, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+917013841616, provider_call_id=bf9a1639-43fe-43eb-a47c-1e88cd3836a8, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+917013841616, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-12 12:36:25, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=ROUTHU, resume_review_id=68eb53479f941c720e706fbb, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=62.8, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume follows a structured layout with clear sections, making it easily searchable and readable. However, there's room for improvement in creating a more visually distinct separation between sections to enhance quick scanning., score=68, readability=The font choice and size aid in the readability of the document, though more consistent spacing would improve clarity further. Headings are used effectively, but the addition of dividers or a different formatting style could enhance readability even more., essentialSectionsPresence=All essential sections, such as experience, education, and skills, are present and arranged correctly. Redundancy is avoided, although it could benefit from a bit more detail in the Education section stating specific courses or projects that relate to the job., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume is well-prepared for ATS parsing, with clearly defined sections and relevant technical keywords included. Greater attention to keyword diversity and critical skills could enhance its ATS resonance further., score=66, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=All key elements necessary for ATS readability such as full name, most recent employer, and contact details are clearly positioned and easy to extract. Structuring of content supports good ATS parsing, although integrating role-specific keywords could optimize its compatibility.}, impact={feedback=The resume quantitatively showcases achievements very well, which adds significant strength to the impact section. However, there is room to further diversify action verbs used, and avoid slight repetition noted across different sections., score=61, spellCheck=The resume appears free of spelling errors, underlining attention to detail. A quick review on grammar consistency can ensure there are no overlooked typos or structural issues., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used effectively to break down and highlight key responsibilities and achievements, making them engage quickly. However, consistency in the style of bullet points would bring more uniformity., weakActionVerbs=Most of the action verbs are strong, leading with a results-oriented approach, but some could still be replaced with more vibrant verbs to showcase abilities more dynamically. Consider swapping 'developed' or 'handled' with more precise verbs like 'engineered' or 'executed.', scale=100, quantifyingImpact=Achievements are generally well quantified, using data to demonstrate contributions clearly, a strong point of this resume. Nevertheless, additional quantifiable data in all sections according to standardized measures could increase impact further., repetitionAvoidance=There is a slight repetition of duties and tasks in the work experience section, which can be edited to highlight unique achievements. Rephrasing or bringing new insights, especially between the most recent roles, would contribute distinctiveness., accomplishmentLanguage=The resume successfully utilizes accomplishment-oriented language, clearly emphasizing results and contributions. However, a heavier emphasis on 'how' these accomplishments were achieved could paint a fuller picture for potential employers.}, crispness={feedback=The resume struggles slightly with crispness, evident in somewhat elongated bullet points and details that could be more concise. There's a need to decrease reliance on filler words and phrases to enhance the resume's crispness effectively., resumeLength=The length of the resume is mostly adequate given the experience level, but a more concise presentation of older roles could streamline it further. Maintaining focus chiefly on the most relevant, recent experiences usually adds more weight., score=55, bulletPointsCount=The overall count of bullet points is acceptable; however, reducing them in earlier positions can sharpen focus on recent, relevant accomplishments. A strategic reduction will highlight the most significant achievements without redundancy., fillerWords=Filler words periodically detract from the core message of achievements, suggesting potential refinement. A closer edit to eliminate unnecessary words and tighten descriptions would foster better efficiency in communication., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points extend too long, diminishing their potential impact and clarity. Breaking longer points into two or more concise ones would improve delivery, ideally aiming for brevity without losing detail., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=Stylistically, the resume aligns fairly well with guidelines, benefiting from clear language and mostly consistent formatting. Addressing minor stylistic inconsistencies could elevate the overall quality greatly., score=64, buzzwordsCliches=The language generally tries to avoid cliched terms; however, sections still fall back on buzzwords like 'expert.' Swapping these for more transparent, role-specific achievements could bolster credibility., datesFormatting=Date formatting is consistent and clear throughout the resume, aiding in easy chronology understanding. Maintaining this consistency is beneficial and contributes positively to readability., activeVoice=Active voice is used consistently, leading to a direct and compelling presentation of experience and skills. This approach effectively highlights achievements and contributions in a persuasive manner., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The resume appropriately avoids personal pronouns, keeping a professional tone that aligns with expectations. Continuing this practice ensures the resume remains focused on skills and impact, not the individual.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-12T07:17:14.687478, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-12 07:17:14, id=ebf1867e-8ff9-424c-9ef7-b65026eadfd7, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=18, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=18}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-12 07:17:10, status=ringing}

{created_at_str=2025-10-12 07:17:10, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-12T07:17:10.889424, scheduled_at=2025-10-12T07:17:10.889384, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+917013841616, provider_call_id=bf9a1639-43fe-43eb-a47c-1e88cd3836a8, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+917013841616, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-12 12:36:25, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=ROUTHU, resume_review_id=68eb53479f941c720e706fbb, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=62.8, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume follows a structured layout with clear sections, making it easily searchable and readable. However, there's room for improvement in creating a more visually distinct separation between sections to enhance quick scanning., score=68, readability=The font choice and size aid in the readability of the document, though more consistent spacing would improve clarity further. Headings are used effectively, but the addition of dividers or a different formatting style could enhance readability even more., essentialSectionsPresence=All essential sections, such as experience, education, and skills, are present and arranged correctly. Redundancy is avoided, although it could benefit from a bit more detail in the Education section stating specific courses or projects that relate to the job., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume is well-prepared for ATS parsing, with clearly defined sections and relevant technical keywords included. Greater attention to keyword diversity and critical skills could enhance its ATS resonance further., score=66, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=All key elements necessary for ATS readability such as full name, most recent employer, and contact details are clearly positioned and easy to extract. Structuring of content supports good ATS parsing, although integrating role-specific keywords could optimize its compatibility.}, impact={feedback=The resume quantitatively showcases achievements very well, which adds significant strength to the impact section. However, there is room to further diversify action verbs used, and avoid slight repetition noted across different sections., score=61, spellCheck=The resume appears free of spelling errors, underlining attention to detail. A quick review on grammar consistency can ensure there are no overlooked typos or structural issues., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used effectively to break down and highlight key responsibilities and achievements, making them engage quickly. However, consistency in the style of bullet points would bring more uniformity., weakActionVerbs=Most of the action verbs are strong, leading with a results-oriented approach, but some could still be replaced with more vibrant verbs to showcase abilities more dynamically. Consider swapping 'developed' or 'handled' with more precise verbs like 'engineered' or 'executed.', scale=100, quantifyingImpact=Achievements are generally well quantified, using data to demonstrate contributions clearly, a strong point of this resume. Nevertheless, additional quantifiable data in all sections according to standardized measures could increase impact further., repetitionAvoidance=There is a slight repetition of duties and tasks in the work experience section, which can be edited to highlight unique achievements. Rephrasing or bringing new insights, especially between the most recent roles, would contribute distinctiveness., accomplishmentLanguage=The resume successfully utilizes accomplishment-oriented language, clearly emphasizing results and contributions. However, a heavier emphasis on 'how' these accomplishments were achieved could paint a fuller picture for potential employers.}, crispness={feedback=The resume struggles slightly with crispness, evident in somewhat elongated bullet points and details that could be more concise. There's a need to decrease reliance on filler words and phrases to enhance the resume's crispness effectively., resumeLength=The length of the resume is mostly adequate given the experience level, but a more concise presentation of older roles could streamline it further. Maintaining focus chiefly on the most relevant, recent experiences usually adds more weight., score=55, bulletPointsCount=The overall count of bullet points is acceptable; however, reducing them in earlier positions can sharpen focus on recent, relevant accomplishments. A strategic reduction will highlight the most significant achievements without redundancy., fillerWords=Filler words periodically detract from the core message of achievements, suggesting potential refinement. A closer edit to eliminate unnecessary words and tighten descriptions would foster better efficiency in communication., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points extend too long, diminishing their potential impact and clarity. Breaking longer points into two or more concise ones would improve delivery, ideally aiming for brevity without losing detail., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=Stylistically, the resume aligns fairly well with guidelines, benefiting from clear language and mostly consistent formatting. Addressing minor stylistic inconsistencies could elevate the overall quality greatly., score=64, buzzwordsCliches=The language generally tries to avoid cliched terms; however, sections still fall back on buzzwords like 'expert.' Swapping these for more transparent, role-specific achievements could bolster credibility., datesFormatting=Date formatting is consistent and clear throughout the resume, aiding in easy chronology understanding. Maintaining this consistency is beneficial and contributes positively to readability., activeVoice=Active voice is used consistently, leading to a direct and compelling presentation of experience and skills. This approach effectively highlights achievements and contributions in a persuasive manner., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=The resume appropriately avoids personal pronouns, keeping a professional tone that aligns with expectations. Continuing this practice ensures the resume remains focused on skills and impact, not the individual.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-12T07:17:12.774268, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-12 07:17:12, id=ebf1867e-8ff9-424c-9ef7-b65026eadfd7, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=18, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=18}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-12 07:17:10, status=initiated}