Dashboard

{created_at_str=2025-10-12 06:12:09, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=1.9, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=1.54, transcriber=0.187, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=1.54}, llm=0.16999999999999998, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0.187}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0.004, extraction=0, conversation=0.121, hangup=0.045}}, created_at=2025-10-12T06:12:09.971148, scheduled_at=2025-10-12T06:12:09.971113, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+918810301369, provider_call_id=9a2b5511-daca-46b9-8f3d-d4fba57f913a, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+918810301369, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-12 11:31:36, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=Surajbhan, resume_review_id=68eb44079f941c720e706c95, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=59.6, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume is fairly well-structured with sections like Work History, Education, and Skills clearly marked. However, some formatting inconsistencies, such as varying bullet point symbols and date formats, hinder readability., score=64, readability=While the sections are generally readable, the use of abbreviations and acronyms without explanation could confuse some readers. Additionally, text is sometimes dense and could benefit from more spacing to improve visual clarity., essentialSectionsPresence=The Experience and Education sections are present and provide necessary information, although the Experience section could be more detailed. Key sections such as the Professional Summary and Skills are appropriately included and contribute to the overall understanding of the candidate's profile., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume is relatively ATS-friendly, with clear headings and structured sections that help with parsing. However, minor adjustments, like ensuring all section headers use uniform formatting, would increase ATS compatibility., score=67, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Essential elements such as the candidate's name, contact information, and experience are well-defined and readable by ATS. Adding more role-specific keywords throughout the document will improve its ranking in ATS searches.}, impact={feedback=The resume includes some impactful content, particularly in the skills and technical areas. However, the use of quantifiable results and specific metrics is limited, weakening the immediate impact of accomplishments., score=57, spellCheck=There are no glaring spelling errors, but careful proofreading to catch subtle grammatical or typographical errors is always recommended., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points effectively outline responsibilities and achievements but lack consistent power verbs and quantifiable outcomes. Ensuring each bullet point showcases a result or specific achievement would enhance the impact., weakActionVerbs=Some bullet points start with passive or weak verbs, which detract from their impact. Replacing these with more assertive verbs such as >Led, Improved, Achieved< would heighten the persuasive power., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=There is limited use of numerical data or percentages to quantify achievements, which would greatly bolster the effectiveness of the resume. Including more specific metrics, such as >increase uptime by X%<, will convey the candidate's value more compellingly., repetitionAvoidance=There is some repetition in the language used, particularly concerning technology usage. Diversifying the language and focusing on unique aspects of each role could enhance engagement., accomplishmentLanguage=The language occasionally veers towards task-oriented rather than accomplishment-oriented descriptions. Revising sentences to highlight outcomes and specific contributions would improve the resume.}, crispness={feedback=The resume could be more concise as it currently includes superfluous details that may dilute key information. Tightening the text and focusing on core achievements can improve its overall succinctness and effectiveness., resumeLength=The length is generally appropriate for the candidate's experience level, yet some sections include unnecessary details that could be condensed. This would help maintain reader engagement and highlight key achievements., score=54, bulletPointsCount=The number of bullet points is excessive in some sections, which may overwhelm readers. Prioritizing the most impactful achievements and consolidating similar tasks can improve focus and clarity., fillerWords=The text includes filler words that do not add value, such as >Detail-oriented< which could be replaced with direct examples of attention to detail. Eliminating these will improve the resume's sharpness., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points are overly long and could be divided or shortened to enhance clarity. Brevity is crucial to convey key points effectively and ensure the resume is engaging throughout., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=While generally well-written, the resume suffers from common pitfalls such as clichés and inconsistent formatting. Removing buzzwords and ensuring uniformity in style would greatly enhance the overall quality., score=56, buzzwordsCliches=The use of common buzzwords like >team player< detracts from the professional tone. Replacing these with specific examples or results would fortify the impact., datesFormatting=Date formatting lacks consistency, with a mix of >Month/Year< and >Month.Year< styles. Adhering to a single format throughout is recommended for professional polish., activeVoice=Active voice is present but could be stronger in some sections to make achievements stand out more. Consistently using active language will increase engagement and clarity., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=Personal pronouns do not appear frequently, which aligns with convention. However, ensure the consistent use of third-person to maintain professional tone across the entire document.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=assistant: Hi is that Surajbhan?
user:  hello
assistant: of- India Group
, updated_at=2025-10-12T06:12:46.115412, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-12 06:12:46, id=f6ef60d2-f45c-4318-85e0-901b51cd7a49, campaign_id=null, summary=The conversation begins with the agent greeting the user, asking if they are Surajbhan. The user responds with a simple "hello." The agent then mentions "of- India Group," but the context of this statement is unclear. The conversation appears to be in its early stages, with no specific issues or topics discussed yet., error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=12.2, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=12.199938, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=12.199938, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=175, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=154, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=21}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={gpt-4o-mini={output=66, input=22}, azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=39, input=2874}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization={output=66, input=22, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=gpt-4o-mini}, extraction=null, conversation={output=39, input=2874, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup={output=7, input=3002, provider_connected=false, provider=openai, model=gpt-4o-mini}}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-12 06:12:09, status=call-disconnected}

{created_at_str=2025-10-12 06:12:09, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-12T06:12:09.971148, scheduled_at=2025-10-12T06:12:09.971113, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+918810301369, provider_call_id=9a2b5511-daca-46b9-8f3d-d4fba57f913a, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+918810301369, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-12 11:31:36, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=Surajbhan, resume_review_id=68eb44079f941c720e706c95, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=59.6, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume is fairly well-structured with sections like Work History, Education, and Skills clearly marked. However, some formatting inconsistencies, such as varying bullet point symbols and date formats, hinder readability., score=64, readability=While the sections are generally readable, the use of abbreviations and acronyms without explanation could confuse some readers. Additionally, text is sometimes dense and could benefit from more spacing to improve visual clarity., essentialSectionsPresence=The Experience and Education sections are present and provide necessary information, although the Experience section could be more detailed. Key sections such as the Professional Summary and Skills are appropriately included and contribute to the overall understanding of the candidate's profile., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume is relatively ATS-friendly, with clear headings and structured sections that help with parsing. However, minor adjustments, like ensuring all section headers use uniform formatting, would increase ATS compatibility., score=67, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Essential elements such as the candidate's name, contact information, and experience are well-defined and readable by ATS. Adding more role-specific keywords throughout the document will improve its ranking in ATS searches.}, impact={feedback=The resume includes some impactful content, particularly in the skills and technical areas. However, the use of quantifiable results and specific metrics is limited, weakening the immediate impact of accomplishments., score=57, spellCheck=There are no glaring spelling errors, but careful proofreading to catch subtle grammatical or typographical errors is always recommended., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points effectively outline responsibilities and achievements but lack consistent power verbs and quantifiable outcomes. Ensuring each bullet point showcases a result or specific achievement would enhance the impact., weakActionVerbs=Some bullet points start with passive or weak verbs, which detract from their impact. Replacing these with more assertive verbs such as >Led, Improved, Achieved< would heighten the persuasive power., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=There is limited use of numerical data or percentages to quantify achievements, which would greatly bolster the effectiveness of the resume. Including more specific metrics, such as >increase uptime by X%<, will convey the candidate's value more compellingly., repetitionAvoidance=There is some repetition in the language used, particularly concerning technology usage. Diversifying the language and focusing on unique aspects of each role could enhance engagement., accomplishmentLanguage=The language occasionally veers towards task-oriented rather than accomplishment-oriented descriptions. Revising sentences to highlight outcomes and specific contributions would improve the resume.}, crispness={feedback=The resume could be more concise as it currently includes superfluous details that may dilute key information. Tightening the text and focusing on core achievements can improve its overall succinctness and effectiveness., resumeLength=The length is generally appropriate for the candidate's experience level, yet some sections include unnecessary details that could be condensed. This would help maintain reader engagement and highlight key achievements., score=54, bulletPointsCount=The number of bullet points is excessive in some sections, which may overwhelm readers. Prioritizing the most impactful achievements and consolidating similar tasks can improve focus and clarity., fillerWords=The text includes filler words that do not add value, such as >Detail-oriented< which could be replaced with direct examples of attention to detail. Eliminating these will improve the resume's sharpness., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points are overly long and could be divided or shortened to enhance clarity. Brevity is crucial to convey key points effectively and ensure the resume is engaging throughout., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=While generally well-written, the resume suffers from common pitfalls such as clichés and inconsistent formatting. Removing buzzwords and ensuring uniformity in style would greatly enhance the overall quality., score=56, buzzwordsCliches=The use of common buzzwords like >team player< detracts from the professional tone. Replacing these with specific examples or results would fortify the impact., datesFormatting=Date formatting lacks consistency, with a mix of >Month/Year< and >Month.Year< styles. Adhering to a single format throughout is recommended for professional polish., activeVoice=Active voice is present but could be stronger in some sections to make achievements stand out more. Consistently using active language will increase engagement and clarity., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=Personal pronouns do not appear frequently, which aligns with convention. However, ensure the consistent use of third-person to maintain professional tone across the entire document.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-12T06:12:24.437064, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-12 06:12:24, id=f6ef60d2-f45c-4318-85e0-901b51cd7a49, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=21, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=21}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-12 06:12:09, status=in-progress}

{created_at_str=2025-10-12 06:12:09, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-12T06:12:09.971148, scheduled_at=2025-10-12T06:12:09.971113, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+918810301369, provider_call_id=9a2b5511-daca-46b9-8f3d-d4fba57f913a, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+918810301369, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-12 11:31:36, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=Surajbhan, resume_review_id=68eb44079f941c720e706c95, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=59.6, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume is fairly well-structured with sections like Work History, Education, and Skills clearly marked. However, some formatting inconsistencies, such as varying bullet point symbols and date formats, hinder readability., score=64, readability=While the sections are generally readable, the use of abbreviations and acronyms without explanation could confuse some readers. Additionally, text is sometimes dense and could benefit from more spacing to improve visual clarity., essentialSectionsPresence=The Experience and Education sections are present and provide necessary information, although the Experience section could be more detailed. Key sections such as the Professional Summary and Skills are appropriately included and contribute to the overall understanding of the candidate's profile., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume is relatively ATS-friendly, with clear headings and structured sections that help with parsing. However, minor adjustments, like ensuring all section headers use uniform formatting, would increase ATS compatibility., score=67, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Essential elements such as the candidate's name, contact information, and experience are well-defined and readable by ATS. Adding more role-specific keywords throughout the document will improve its ranking in ATS searches.}, impact={feedback=The resume includes some impactful content, particularly in the skills and technical areas. However, the use of quantifiable results and specific metrics is limited, weakening the immediate impact of accomplishments., score=57, spellCheck=There are no glaring spelling errors, but careful proofreading to catch subtle grammatical or typographical errors is always recommended., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points effectively outline responsibilities and achievements but lack consistent power verbs and quantifiable outcomes. Ensuring each bullet point showcases a result or specific achievement would enhance the impact., weakActionVerbs=Some bullet points start with passive or weak verbs, which detract from their impact. Replacing these with more assertive verbs such as >Led, Improved, Achieved< would heighten the persuasive power., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=There is limited use of numerical data or percentages to quantify achievements, which would greatly bolster the effectiveness of the resume. Including more specific metrics, such as >increase uptime by X%<, will convey the candidate's value more compellingly., repetitionAvoidance=There is some repetition in the language used, particularly concerning technology usage. Diversifying the language and focusing on unique aspects of each role could enhance engagement., accomplishmentLanguage=The language occasionally veers towards task-oriented rather than accomplishment-oriented descriptions. Revising sentences to highlight outcomes and specific contributions would improve the resume.}, crispness={feedback=The resume could be more concise as it currently includes superfluous details that may dilute key information. Tightening the text and focusing on core achievements can improve its overall succinctness and effectiveness., resumeLength=The length is generally appropriate for the candidate's experience level, yet some sections include unnecessary details that could be condensed. This would help maintain reader engagement and highlight key achievements., score=54, bulletPointsCount=The number of bullet points is excessive in some sections, which may overwhelm readers. Prioritizing the most impactful achievements and consolidating similar tasks can improve focus and clarity., fillerWords=The text includes filler words that do not add value, such as >Detail-oriented< which could be replaced with direct examples of attention to detail. Eliminating these will improve the resume's sharpness., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points are overly long and could be divided or shortened to enhance clarity. Brevity is crucial to convey key points effectively and ensure the resume is engaging throughout., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=While generally well-written, the resume suffers from common pitfalls such as clichés and inconsistent formatting. Removing buzzwords and ensuring uniformity in style would greatly enhance the overall quality., score=56, buzzwordsCliches=The use of common buzzwords like >team player< detracts from the professional tone. Replacing these with specific examples or results would fortify the impact., datesFormatting=Date formatting lacks consistency, with a mix of >Month/Year< and >Month.Year< styles. Adhering to a single format throughout is recommended for professional polish., activeVoice=Active voice is present but could be stronger in some sections to make achievements stand out more. Consistently using active language will increase engagement and clarity., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=Personal pronouns do not appear frequently, which aligns with convention. However, ensure the consistent use of third-person to maintain professional tone across the entire document.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-12T06:12:13.180749, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-12 06:12:13, id=f6ef60d2-f45c-4318-85e0-901b51cd7a49, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=21, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=21}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-12 06:12:09, status=ringing}

{created_at_str=2025-10-12 06:12:09, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-12T06:12:09.971148, scheduled_at=2025-10-12T06:12:09.971113, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+918810301369, provider_call_id=9a2b5511-daca-46b9-8f3d-d4fba57f913a, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+918810301369, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-12 11:31:36, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=Surajbhan, resume_review_id=68eb44079f941c720e706c95, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=59.6, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume is fairly well-structured with sections like Work History, Education, and Skills clearly marked. However, some formatting inconsistencies, such as varying bullet point symbols and date formats, hinder readability., score=64, readability=While the sections are generally readable, the use of abbreviations and acronyms without explanation could confuse some readers. Additionally, text is sometimes dense and could benefit from more spacing to improve visual clarity., essentialSectionsPresence=The Experience and Education sections are present and provide necessary information, although the Experience section could be more detailed. Key sections such as the Professional Summary and Skills are appropriately included and contribute to the overall understanding of the candidate's profile., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume is relatively ATS-friendly, with clear headings and structured sections that help with parsing. However, minor adjustments, like ensuring all section headers use uniform formatting, would increase ATS compatibility., score=67, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Essential elements such as the candidate's name, contact information, and experience are well-defined and readable by ATS. Adding more role-specific keywords throughout the document will improve its ranking in ATS searches.}, impact={feedback=The resume includes some impactful content, particularly in the skills and technical areas. However, the use of quantifiable results and specific metrics is limited, weakening the immediate impact of accomplishments., score=57, spellCheck=There are no glaring spelling errors, but careful proofreading to catch subtle grammatical or typographical errors is always recommended., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points effectively outline responsibilities and achievements but lack consistent power verbs and quantifiable outcomes. Ensuring each bullet point showcases a result or specific achievement would enhance the impact., weakActionVerbs=Some bullet points start with passive or weak verbs, which detract from their impact. Replacing these with more assertive verbs such as >Led, Improved, Achieved< would heighten the persuasive power., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=There is limited use of numerical data or percentages to quantify achievements, which would greatly bolster the effectiveness of the resume. Including more specific metrics, such as >increase uptime by X%<, will convey the candidate's value more compellingly., repetitionAvoidance=There is some repetition in the language used, particularly concerning technology usage. Diversifying the language and focusing on unique aspects of each role could enhance engagement., accomplishmentLanguage=The language occasionally veers towards task-oriented rather than accomplishment-oriented descriptions. Revising sentences to highlight outcomes and specific contributions would improve the resume.}, crispness={feedback=The resume could be more concise as it currently includes superfluous details that may dilute key information. Tightening the text and focusing on core achievements can improve its overall succinctness and effectiveness., resumeLength=The length is generally appropriate for the candidate's experience level, yet some sections include unnecessary details that could be condensed. This would help maintain reader engagement and highlight key achievements., score=54, bulletPointsCount=The number of bullet points is excessive in some sections, which may overwhelm readers. Prioritizing the most impactful achievements and consolidating similar tasks can improve focus and clarity., fillerWords=The text includes filler words that do not add value, such as >Detail-oriented< which could be replaced with direct examples of attention to detail. Eliminating these will improve the resume's sharpness., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points are overly long and could be divided or shortened to enhance clarity. Brevity is crucial to convey key points effectively and ensure the resume is engaging throughout., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=While generally well-written, the resume suffers from common pitfalls such as clichés and inconsistent formatting. Removing buzzwords and ensuring uniformity in style would greatly enhance the overall quality., score=56, buzzwordsCliches=The use of common buzzwords like >team player< detracts from the professional tone. Replacing these with specific examples or results would fortify the impact., datesFormatting=Date formatting lacks consistency, with a mix of >Month/Year< and >Month.Year< styles. Adhering to a single format throughout is recommended for professional polish., activeVoice=Active voice is present but could be stronger in some sections to make achievements stand out more. Consistently using active language will increase engagement and clarity., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=Personal pronouns do not appear frequently, which aligns with convention. However, ensure the consistent use of third-person to maintain professional tone across the entire document.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-12T06:12:11.994352, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-12 06:12:11, id=f6ef60d2-f45c-4318-85e0-901b51cd7a49, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=21, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=21}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-12 06:12:09, status=initiated}