Call Details
Bolna ID:
d706de28-b974-41c9-b715-9d0e5a21fcf6
Phone: +919944332285
From: +918035316264
Status: completed
Processing: COMPLETED
Duration: 1.40s
Cost: ₹0.52
Hangup Details
Hangup By: Plivo
Reason: End of inputs from Bolna
Timestamps
Started:
2025-10-11 18:32:08
Ended:
Not set
Last Processed:
2025-10-11 18:34:09
Last Retry At:
2025-10-11 18:34:09
Next Retry Scheduled:
2025-10-11 18:38:42
Next Call Scheduled:
2025-10-11 18:38:42
Call Timeline 13
Call History (Raw Callbacks) 5
{created_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:10, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.52, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0.018, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0.004, transfer_cost=0.0, platform=0.5, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0.018}, network=0.925, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0.002, extraction=0, conversation=0.002, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-11T13:02:10.41919, scheduled_at=2025-10-11T13:02:10.41916, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=2.0, to_number=+919944332285, provider_call_id=0369bf94-f57d-487c-a8a6-02a676cd9e40, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=https://aps1.media.plivo.com/v1/Account/MAZTZJNZBKOWQXMZBIZJ/Recording/5b7c1791-075c-4e04-b0f5-7d4706400358.mp3, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=4010, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=Plivo, hangup_reason=End of inputs from Bolna}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919944332285, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-11 18:21:08, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=A, resume_review_id=68ea526318c34103788d7ebc, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=60.4, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume is generally well-organized, but lacks clear section headers, which may affect section discernment. Reverse chronological order in the Experience section is suitable for highlighting the candidate's most recent roles., score=63, readability=While the content is dense, improving the use of headings and spacing would make it more digestible for a quick read. Easier navigation through the sections would enhance the potential for a positive first impression., essentialSectionsPresence=Essential sections such as Experience and Education are present but could benefit from clearer demarcation for enhanced legibility. The addition of a Skills or Competencies section would add value for a technical position., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume appears structurally compatible with ATS, with clear sections and relevant keywords integrated. However, ensuring heading uniformity and keyword frequency is maintained will support ATS success., score=65, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as name, titles, and dates are ATS-friendly, though ensuring uniform formatting across all sections can prevent parsing errors. Enhanced focus on keyword optimization could further boost ATS performance.}, impact={feedback=The resume contains numerous projects and roles, showing breadth, yet lacks specific metrics to quantify impact. The language generally conveys a strong contribution, although using more action-oriented words can enhance clarity., score=58, spellCheck=The text is generally free of errors, though automated spell check could help ensure meticulous proofreading. Consistency checks for spelling and grammar remain beneficial., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used effectively to break down tasks but can be too lengthy, risking a loss of reader focus. Refining bullet point structure to highlight results over processes would improve clarity., weakActionVerbs=Action verbs used convey management responsibilities but may lack dynamism. Verbs like 'achieved,' 'improved,' or 'facilitated' can effectively replace weaker ones for a stronger impression., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=While projects are described in detail, specific outcomes, and metrics such as 'increased efficiency by 20%' are rarely highlighted. Including more statistics would strengthen the applicant's impact statement., repetitionAvoidance=There's some repetition of terms like 'managed' across sections, which could be diversified to maintain reader engagement. Introducing synonyms or varied sentences can alleviate monotony., accomplishmentLanguage=The language is mostly fit for purpose, focusing on achievements rather than duties. However, further incorporation of results-focused language would maximize impact.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is extensive, offering a comprehensive view but at the cost of conciseness, which can overwhelm. Streamlining key achievements into shorter, sharper points would improve overall crispness., resumeLength=The substantial length of the resume may not be optimal for quick review, especially in initial screenings. Condensing the information, while still covering all necessary details, would be advantageous., score=56, bulletPointsCount=The bullet point count is high, which helps divide the text but risks reader burnout due to volume. Prioritizing essential bullet points for each role would enhance focus and readability., fillerWords=The presence of filler words that do not add value to the content can clutter the resume. Revising the text to eliminate these would improve precision and clarity., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points are excessively long and could benefit from tightening to focus on primary achievements or responsibilities. Ensuring all points are succinct and to the point would create more impact., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume largely avoids the pitfalls of clichés and instead uses industry-specific terminology, though caution is needed for overuse. Consistency in formatting and language style would polish the document further., score=60, buzzwordsCliches=While mostly avoiding overused phrases, the resume should aim to strike a balance by including more role-specific keywords. This approach helps to uniquely define the applicant’s expertise., datesFormatting=There is some inconsistency in date formatting that requires correction for professional appearance. Standardizing formats ensures clarity and avoids misinterpretation., activeVoice=The resume predominantly uses active voice, effectively showing the candidate's proactive approach to past roles. Continued use of this style will support a dynamic and engaging narrative., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=There's a proper avoidance of personal pronouns, maintaining a professional tone throughout the document. This aligns with typical resume-writing conventions.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=assistant: Hi is that A?
user: has been for
assistant: Sorry, I didn’t catch that. Could you please repeat?
, updated_at=2025-10-11T13:03:41.660955, answered_by_voice_mail=true, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-11 13:03:41, id=d706de28-b974-41c9-b715-9d0e5a21fcf6, campaign_id=null, summary=The conversation begins with the agent greeting the user and asking if they are "A." The user responds but their message is unclear. The agent requests the user to repeat their statement for clarification., error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction={"asst_T3MUlbYNAcyJN8Sd6SgOdOpc": {"dispositions": {"disposition_1": "No Contact", "disposition_2": "No Response", "disposition_3": ""}}}, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction={asst_T3MUlbYNAcyJN8Sd6SgOdOpc={dispositions={disposition_1=No Contact, disposition_2=No Response, disposition_3=}}}, smart_status=dropped, conversation_duration=1.4, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=1.1999375, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=1.1999375, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=13, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=13}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={gpt-4o-mini={output=38, input=30}, azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=13, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization={output=38, input=30, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=gpt-4o-mini}, extraction=null, conversation={output=13, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:10, status=completed}
{created_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:10, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.02, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0.018, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0.004, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0.018}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0.002, extraction=0, conversation=0.002, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-11T13:02:10.41919, scheduled_at=2025-10-11T13:02:10.41916, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919944332285, provider_call_id=0369bf94-f57d-487c-a8a6-02a676cd9e40, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919944332285, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-11 18:21:08, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=A, resume_review_id=68ea526318c34103788d7ebc, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=60.4, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume is generally well-organized, but lacks clear section headers, which may affect section discernment. Reverse chronological order in the Experience section is suitable for highlighting the candidate's most recent roles., score=63, readability=While the content is dense, improving the use of headings and spacing would make it more digestible for a quick read. Easier navigation through the sections would enhance the potential for a positive first impression., essentialSectionsPresence=Essential sections such as Experience and Education are present but could benefit from clearer demarcation for enhanced legibility. The addition of a Skills or Competencies section would add value for a technical position., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume appears structurally compatible with ATS, with clear sections and relevant keywords integrated. However, ensuring heading uniformity and keyword frequency is maintained will support ATS success., score=65, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as name, titles, and dates are ATS-friendly, though ensuring uniform formatting across all sections can prevent parsing errors. Enhanced focus on keyword optimization could further boost ATS performance.}, impact={feedback=The resume contains numerous projects and roles, showing breadth, yet lacks specific metrics to quantify impact. The language generally conveys a strong contribution, although using more action-oriented words can enhance clarity., score=58, spellCheck=The text is generally free of errors, though automated spell check could help ensure meticulous proofreading. Consistency checks for spelling and grammar remain beneficial., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used effectively to break down tasks but can be too lengthy, risking a loss of reader focus. Refining bullet point structure to highlight results over processes would improve clarity., weakActionVerbs=Action verbs used convey management responsibilities but may lack dynamism. Verbs like 'achieved,' 'improved,' or 'facilitated' can effectively replace weaker ones for a stronger impression., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=While projects are described in detail, specific outcomes, and metrics such as 'increased efficiency by 20%' are rarely highlighted. Including more statistics would strengthen the applicant's impact statement., repetitionAvoidance=There's some repetition of terms like 'managed' across sections, which could be diversified to maintain reader engagement. Introducing synonyms or varied sentences can alleviate monotony., accomplishmentLanguage=The language is mostly fit for purpose, focusing on achievements rather than duties. However, further incorporation of results-focused language would maximize impact.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is extensive, offering a comprehensive view but at the cost of conciseness, which can overwhelm. Streamlining key achievements into shorter, sharper points would improve overall crispness., resumeLength=The substantial length of the resume may not be optimal for quick review, especially in initial screenings. Condensing the information, while still covering all necessary details, would be advantageous., score=56, bulletPointsCount=The bullet point count is high, which helps divide the text but risks reader burnout due to volume. Prioritizing essential bullet points for each role would enhance focus and readability., fillerWords=The presence of filler words that do not add value to the content can clutter the resume. Revising the text to eliminate these would improve precision and clarity., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points are excessively long and could benefit from tightening to focus on primary achievements or responsibilities. Ensuring all points are succinct and to the point would create more impact., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume largely avoids the pitfalls of clichés and instead uses industry-specific terminology, though caution is needed for overuse. Consistency in formatting and language style would polish the document further., score=60, buzzwordsCliches=While mostly avoiding overused phrases, the resume should aim to strike a balance by including more role-specific keywords. This approach helps to uniquely define the applicant’s expertise., datesFormatting=There is some inconsistency in date formatting that requires correction for professional appearance. Standardizing formats ensures clarity and avoids misinterpretation., activeVoice=The resume predominantly uses active voice, effectively showing the candidate's proactive approach to past roles. Continued use of this style will support a dynamic and engaging narrative., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=There's a proper avoidance of personal pronouns, maintaining a professional tone throughout the document. This aligns with typical resume-writing conventions.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=assistant: Hi is that A?
user: has been for
assistant: Sorry, I didn’t catch that. Could you please repeat?
, updated_at=2025-10-11T13:02:36.225089, answered_by_voice_mail=true, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:36, id=d706de28-b974-41c9-b715-9d0e5a21fcf6, campaign_id=null, summary=The conversation begins with the agent greeting the user and asking if they are "A." The user responds but their message is unclear. The agent requests the user to repeat their statement for clarification., error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=1.4, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=1.1999375, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=1.1999375, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=13, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=13}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={gpt-4o-mini={output=38, input=30}, azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=13, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization={output=38, input=30, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=gpt-4o-mini}, extraction=null, conversation={output=13, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:10, status=call-disconnected}
{created_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:10, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-11T13:02:10.41919, scheduled_at=2025-10-11T13:02:10.41916, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919944332285, provider_call_id=0369bf94-f57d-487c-a8a6-02a676cd9e40, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919944332285, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-11 18:21:08, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=A, resume_review_id=68ea526318c34103788d7ebc, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=60.4, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume is generally well-organized, but lacks clear section headers, which may affect section discernment. Reverse chronological order in the Experience section is suitable for highlighting the candidate's most recent roles., score=63, readability=While the content is dense, improving the use of headings and spacing would make it more digestible for a quick read. Easier navigation through the sections would enhance the potential for a positive first impression., essentialSectionsPresence=Essential sections such as Experience and Education are present but could benefit from clearer demarcation for enhanced legibility. The addition of a Skills or Competencies section would add value for a technical position., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume appears structurally compatible with ATS, with clear sections and relevant keywords integrated. However, ensuring heading uniformity and keyword frequency is maintained will support ATS success., score=65, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as name, titles, and dates are ATS-friendly, though ensuring uniform formatting across all sections can prevent parsing errors. Enhanced focus on keyword optimization could further boost ATS performance.}, impact={feedback=The resume contains numerous projects and roles, showing breadth, yet lacks specific metrics to quantify impact. The language generally conveys a strong contribution, although using more action-oriented words can enhance clarity., score=58, spellCheck=The text is generally free of errors, though automated spell check could help ensure meticulous proofreading. Consistency checks for spelling and grammar remain beneficial., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used effectively to break down tasks but can be too lengthy, risking a loss of reader focus. Refining bullet point structure to highlight results over processes would improve clarity., weakActionVerbs=Action verbs used convey management responsibilities but may lack dynamism. Verbs like 'achieved,' 'improved,' or 'facilitated' can effectively replace weaker ones for a stronger impression., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=While projects are described in detail, specific outcomes, and metrics such as 'increased efficiency by 20%' are rarely highlighted. Including more statistics would strengthen the applicant's impact statement., repetitionAvoidance=There's some repetition of terms like 'managed' across sections, which could be diversified to maintain reader engagement. Introducing synonyms or varied sentences can alleviate monotony., accomplishmentLanguage=The language is mostly fit for purpose, focusing on achievements rather than duties. However, further incorporation of results-focused language would maximize impact.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is extensive, offering a comprehensive view but at the cost of conciseness, which can overwhelm. Streamlining key achievements into shorter, sharper points would improve overall crispness., resumeLength=The substantial length of the resume may not be optimal for quick review, especially in initial screenings. Condensing the information, while still covering all necessary details, would be advantageous., score=56, bulletPointsCount=The bullet point count is high, which helps divide the text but risks reader burnout due to volume. Prioritizing essential bullet points for each role would enhance focus and readability., fillerWords=The presence of filler words that do not add value to the content can clutter the resume. Revising the text to eliminate these would improve precision and clarity., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points are excessively long and could benefit from tightening to focus on primary achievements or responsibilities. Ensuring all points are succinct and to the point would create more impact., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume largely avoids the pitfalls of clichés and instead uses industry-specific terminology, though caution is needed for overuse. Consistency in formatting and language style would polish the document further., score=60, buzzwordsCliches=While mostly avoiding overused phrases, the resume should aim to strike a balance by including more role-specific keywords. This approach helps to uniquely define the applicant’s expertise., datesFormatting=There is some inconsistency in date formatting that requires correction for professional appearance. Standardizing formats ensures clarity and avoids misinterpretation., activeVoice=The resume predominantly uses active voice, effectively showing the candidate's proactive approach to past roles. Continued use of this style will support a dynamic and engaging narrative., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=There's a proper avoidance of personal pronouns, maintaining a professional tone throughout the document. This aligns with typical resume-writing conventions.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-11T13:02:25.509788, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:25, id=d706de28-b974-41c9-b715-9d0e5a21fcf6, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=13, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=13}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:10, status=in-progress}
{created_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:10, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-11T13:02:10.41919, scheduled_at=2025-10-11T13:02:10.41916, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919944332285, provider_call_id=0369bf94-f57d-487c-a8a6-02a676cd9e40, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919944332285, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-11 18:21:08, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=A, resume_review_id=68ea526318c34103788d7ebc, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=60.4, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume is generally well-organized, but lacks clear section headers, which may affect section discernment. Reverse chronological order in the Experience section is suitable for highlighting the candidate's most recent roles., score=63, readability=While the content is dense, improving the use of headings and spacing would make it more digestible for a quick read. Easier navigation through the sections would enhance the potential for a positive first impression., essentialSectionsPresence=Essential sections such as Experience and Education are present but could benefit from clearer demarcation for enhanced legibility. The addition of a Skills or Competencies section would add value for a technical position., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume appears structurally compatible with ATS, with clear sections and relevant keywords integrated. However, ensuring heading uniformity and keyword frequency is maintained will support ATS success., score=65, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as name, titles, and dates are ATS-friendly, though ensuring uniform formatting across all sections can prevent parsing errors. Enhanced focus on keyword optimization could further boost ATS performance.}, impact={feedback=The resume contains numerous projects and roles, showing breadth, yet lacks specific metrics to quantify impact. The language generally conveys a strong contribution, although using more action-oriented words can enhance clarity., score=58, spellCheck=The text is generally free of errors, though automated spell check could help ensure meticulous proofreading. Consistency checks for spelling and grammar remain beneficial., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used effectively to break down tasks but can be too lengthy, risking a loss of reader focus. Refining bullet point structure to highlight results over processes would improve clarity., weakActionVerbs=Action verbs used convey management responsibilities but may lack dynamism. Verbs like 'achieved,' 'improved,' or 'facilitated' can effectively replace weaker ones for a stronger impression., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=While projects are described in detail, specific outcomes, and metrics such as 'increased efficiency by 20%' are rarely highlighted. Including more statistics would strengthen the applicant's impact statement., repetitionAvoidance=There's some repetition of terms like 'managed' across sections, which could be diversified to maintain reader engagement. Introducing synonyms or varied sentences can alleviate monotony., accomplishmentLanguage=The language is mostly fit for purpose, focusing on achievements rather than duties. However, further incorporation of results-focused language would maximize impact.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is extensive, offering a comprehensive view but at the cost of conciseness, which can overwhelm. Streamlining key achievements into shorter, sharper points would improve overall crispness., resumeLength=The substantial length of the resume may not be optimal for quick review, especially in initial screenings. Condensing the information, while still covering all necessary details, would be advantageous., score=56, bulletPointsCount=The bullet point count is high, which helps divide the text but risks reader burnout due to volume. Prioritizing essential bullet points for each role would enhance focus and readability., fillerWords=The presence of filler words that do not add value to the content can clutter the resume. Revising the text to eliminate these would improve precision and clarity., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points are excessively long and could benefit from tightening to focus on primary achievements or responsibilities. Ensuring all points are succinct and to the point would create more impact., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume largely avoids the pitfalls of clichés and instead uses industry-specific terminology, though caution is needed for overuse. Consistency in formatting and language style would polish the document further., score=60, buzzwordsCliches=While mostly avoiding overused phrases, the resume should aim to strike a balance by including more role-specific keywords. This approach helps to uniquely define the applicant’s expertise., datesFormatting=There is some inconsistency in date formatting that requires correction for professional appearance. Standardizing formats ensures clarity and avoids misinterpretation., activeVoice=The resume predominantly uses active voice, effectively showing the candidate's proactive approach to past roles. Continued use of this style will support a dynamic and engaging narrative., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=There's a proper avoidance of personal pronouns, maintaining a professional tone throughout the document. This aligns with typical resume-writing conventions.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-11T13:02:17.696481, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:17, id=d706de28-b974-41c9-b715-9d0e5a21fcf6, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=13, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=13}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:10, status=ringing}
{created_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:10, agent_id=2fefba9f-c4bd-492b-8ccf-d72da990f4f0, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-10-11T13:02:10.41919, scheduled_at=2025-10-11T13:02:10.41916, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+919944332285, provider_call_id=0369bf94-f57d-487c-a8a6-02a676cd9e40, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+919944332285, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-11 18:21:08, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=A, resume_review_id=68ea526318c34103788d7ebc, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=60.4, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume is generally well-organized, but lacks clear section headers, which may affect section discernment. Reverse chronological order in the Experience section is suitable for highlighting the candidate's most recent roles., score=63, readability=While the content is dense, improving the use of headings and spacing would make it more digestible for a quick read. Easier navigation through the sections would enhance the potential for a positive first impression., essentialSectionsPresence=Essential sections such as Experience and Education are present but could benefit from clearer demarcation for enhanced legibility. The addition of a Skills or Competencies section would add value for a technical position., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume appears structurally compatible with ATS, with clear sections and relevant keywords integrated. However, ensuring heading uniformity and keyword frequency is maintained will support ATS success., score=65, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Key elements such as name, titles, and dates are ATS-friendly, though ensuring uniform formatting across all sections can prevent parsing errors. Enhanced focus on keyword optimization could further boost ATS performance.}, impact={feedback=The resume contains numerous projects and roles, showing breadth, yet lacks specific metrics to quantify impact. The language generally conveys a strong contribution, although using more action-oriented words can enhance clarity., score=58, spellCheck=The text is generally free of errors, though automated spell check could help ensure meticulous proofreading. Consistency checks for spelling and grammar remain beneficial., bulletPointsUsage=Bullet points are used effectively to break down tasks but can be too lengthy, risking a loss of reader focus. Refining bullet point structure to highlight results over processes would improve clarity., weakActionVerbs=Action verbs used convey management responsibilities but may lack dynamism. Verbs like 'achieved,' 'improved,' or 'facilitated' can effectively replace weaker ones for a stronger impression., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=While projects are described in detail, specific outcomes, and metrics such as 'increased efficiency by 20%' are rarely highlighted. Including more statistics would strengthen the applicant's impact statement., repetitionAvoidance=There's some repetition of terms like 'managed' across sections, which could be diversified to maintain reader engagement. Introducing synonyms or varied sentences can alleviate monotony., accomplishmentLanguage=The language is mostly fit for purpose, focusing on achievements rather than duties. However, further incorporation of results-focused language would maximize impact.}, crispness={feedback=The resume is extensive, offering a comprehensive view but at the cost of conciseness, which can overwhelm. Streamlining key achievements into shorter, sharper points would improve overall crispness., resumeLength=The substantial length of the resume may not be optimal for quick review, especially in initial screenings. Condensing the information, while still covering all necessary details, would be advantageous., score=56, bulletPointsCount=The bullet point count is high, which helps divide the text but risks reader burnout due to volume. Prioritizing essential bullet points for each role would enhance focus and readability., fillerWords=The presence of filler words that do not add value to the content can clutter the resume. Revising the text to eliminate these would improve precision and clarity., bulletPointLength=Some bullet points are excessively long and could benefit from tightening to focus on primary achievements or responsibilities. Ensuring all points are succinct and to the point would create more impact., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=The resume largely avoids the pitfalls of clichés and instead uses industry-specific terminology, though caution is needed for overuse. Consistency in formatting and language style would polish the document further., score=60, buzzwordsCliches=While mostly avoiding overused phrases, the resume should aim to strike a balance by including more role-specific keywords. This approach helps to uniquely define the applicant’s expertise., datesFormatting=There is some inconsistency in date formatting that requires correction for professional appearance. Standardizing formats ensures clarity and avoids misinterpretation., activeVoice=The resume predominantly uses active voice, effectively showing the candidate's proactive approach to past roles. Continued use of this style will support a dynamic and engaging narrative., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=There's a proper avoidance of personal pronouns, maintaining a professional tone throughout the document. This aligns with typical resume-writing conventions.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-10-11T13:02:14.714953, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:14, id=d706de28-b974-41c9-b715-9d0e5a21fcf6, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=13, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=13}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-mini={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-mini}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-10-11 13:02:10, status=initiated}
Context Details
{recipient_phone_number=+919944332285, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-10-11 18:21:08, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=A, resume_review_id=68ea526318c34103788d7ebc, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}