Dashboard

{created_at_str=2025-09-28 11:03:58, agent_id=5c934d64-413f-47ee-8326-981f39f451da, total_cost=4.39, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=3.1, transcriber=1.0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=3.1}, llm=0.29100000000000004, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=1.0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0.009000000000000001, extraction=0.006, conversation=0.276, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-09-28T11:03:58.541049, scheduled_at=2025-09-28T11:03:58.541025, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+918052195314, provider_call_id=370e4a10-c958-4d72-a24d-fd3497cf1d24, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+918052195314, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-09-28 16:23:16, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=AVANISH, resume_review_id=68d9134d18c34103788b5573, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=57, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume contains essential sections like Education and Experience, but lacks a clear summary. Contact details are present but not neatly structured, affecting the readability., score=60, readability=While the font size and style are readable, the overall format could use some styling to enhance quick scanning. The block of text in the Objective section hampers readability., essentialSectionsPresence=Experience is not in the recommended reverse chronological order, which can confuse readers. Educational qualifications are well listed, but certifications or additional skills aren't highlighted adequately., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume is moderately compatible with ATS requirements, though lacks key industry-specific keywords. Improving keyword relevance to the candidate's field would enhance ATS performance significantly., score=62, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Essential sections are identifiable, but there's potential for missing keyword optimization that boosts ATS ranking. Adding specific technical skills or industry terms will improve ATS readability.}, impact={feedback=The resume lacks measurable achievements that could highlight the candidate's impact. It contains repetitive information across job roles, which reduces its effectiveness., score=55, spellCheck=No obvious spelling errors are present, suggesting a good level of attention to detail in this regard. However, occasional grammatical improvements could enhance the resume's professionalism., bulletPointsUsage=The use of bullet points for detailing roles is noted, but they lack focus and are sometimes too descriptive rather than impactful. Simplifying and structuring bullet points could improve clarity., weakActionVerbs=Action verbs are weak and don't fully convey achievements or impact. Employing stronger verbs like 'spearheaded,' 'optimized,' or 'enhanced' would provide a more commanding presentation., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=No quantifiable data is presented, such as percentage improvements or cost reductions, which are crucial for depicting impact. Incorporating specific figures could greatly enhance the resume's perceived effectiveness., repetitionAvoidance=There is noticeable repetition of similar duties across different roles, which makes the resume feel redundant. Differentiating roles by highlighting unique contributions would aid in impression., accomplishmentLanguage=The language is more responsibility-oriented than accomplishment-driven. Adjusting wording to reflect achievements rather than duties can make the resume stand out.}, crispness={feedback=The resume stretches over what appears to be a lengthy format, considering the candidate's experience level. Bullet points and content should be more concise to maintain engagement and clarity., resumeLength=The length exceeds what is typically advisable for this experience level, leading to potential recruiter disengagement. Condensing content by focusing on key achievements could help., score=50, bulletPointsCount=There's an excessive number of bullet points, particularly in detailed role descriptions, which detracts from the focus. Streamlining to highlight key points is recommended., fillerWords=Several filler words are present, which bloats the text and hinders straightforward communication. Trimming unnecessary words will sharpen the resume., bulletPointLength=Many bullet points are overly long, containing multiple ideas where single, concise premises would be more effective. Keeping bullet points between 1 to 2 lines is ideal., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=There are multiple instances of buzzwords which dilute the professionalism of the resume. Formatting inconsistencies, especially date presentation, need addressing., score=58, buzzwordsCliches=Common terms like 'challenging environment' or 'asset to my organization' appear frequently, which can weaken the impact. Using unique, specific phrases would improve the resume., datesFormatting=Inconsistent date formatting could confuse readers; ensure it's uniform across the resume for clarity. Stick to a single format, like 'Month Year - Month Year', for professionalism., activeVoice=The resume generally uses passive voice, making the text less direct and assertive. Converting statements to active voice would improve engagement and clarity., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=Personal pronouns are wisely avoided, maintaining a professional tone throughout the resume. This aspect adheres well to resume writing conventions.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data={specific_request=User requested a call back at six o'clock., info_type=process, interest_level=medium, follow_up_needed=Yes, service_interest=none, objections=User requested to reschedule the call.}, arq_job_id=null, transcript=assistant: Hi  AVANISH this is Anita calling from Outspark – a career services platform, part of the Times-of-India Group. How are you doing today?
user:  hello
assistant:  Hello! Can you hear me clearly?
user:  yes yes ma'am
assistant:  Great! How are you doing today? Is this a good time to connect?
user:  actually can you call me after half an hour
assistant:   Sure, I’ll note that. What time would be best for you — around 4:34 AM or later today?
user:  i brought six o'clock
assistant:   Perfect, I’ll call you back at six o'clock. Thank you for letting me know.
user:  ok ok nice
assistant:   Thank you! I’ll speak with you then. Have a good day!
, updated_at=2025-09-28T11:04:57.610827, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-09-28 11:04:57, id=8e518b62-42ff-40a8-9711-a12ffcc01577, campaign_id=null, summary=The conversation was a brief phone call between Anita, an agent from Outspark, and the user, Avanish. Anita initiated the call and asked how Avanish was doing. Avanish requested to reschedule the call for half an hour later. Anita confirmed the new time, suggesting a call back at 4:34 AM, but Avanish preferred 6:00 AM. Anita agreed to the new time and concluded the call, wishing Avanish a good day., error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=40.8, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=41.199936, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=41.199936, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=446, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=136}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={gpt-4o-mini={output=152, input=350}, azure_gpt-4_1-nano={output=86, input=27140}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization={output=94, input=175, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=gpt-4o-mini}, extraction={output=58, input=175, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=gpt-4o-mini}, conversation={output=86, input=27140, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-nano}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-09-28 11:03:58, status=call-disconnected}

{created_at_str=2025-09-28 11:03:58, agent_id=5c934d64-413f-47ee-8326-981f39f451da, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-09-28T11:03:58.541049, scheduled_at=2025-09-28T11:03:58.541025, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+918052195314, provider_call_id=370e4a10-c958-4d72-a24d-fd3497cf1d24, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+918052195314, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-09-28 16:23:16, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=AVANISH, resume_review_id=68d9134d18c34103788b5573, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=57, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume contains essential sections like Education and Experience, but lacks a clear summary. Contact details are present but not neatly structured, affecting the readability., score=60, readability=While the font size and style are readable, the overall format could use some styling to enhance quick scanning. The block of text in the Objective section hampers readability., essentialSectionsPresence=Experience is not in the recommended reverse chronological order, which can confuse readers. Educational qualifications are well listed, but certifications or additional skills aren't highlighted adequately., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume is moderately compatible with ATS requirements, though lacks key industry-specific keywords. Improving keyword relevance to the candidate's field would enhance ATS performance significantly., score=62, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Essential sections are identifiable, but there's potential for missing keyword optimization that boosts ATS ranking. Adding specific technical skills or industry terms will improve ATS readability.}, impact={feedback=The resume lacks measurable achievements that could highlight the candidate's impact. It contains repetitive information across job roles, which reduces its effectiveness., score=55, spellCheck=No obvious spelling errors are present, suggesting a good level of attention to detail in this regard. However, occasional grammatical improvements could enhance the resume's professionalism., bulletPointsUsage=The use of bullet points for detailing roles is noted, but they lack focus and are sometimes too descriptive rather than impactful. Simplifying and structuring bullet points could improve clarity., weakActionVerbs=Action verbs are weak and don't fully convey achievements or impact. Employing stronger verbs like 'spearheaded,' 'optimized,' or 'enhanced' would provide a more commanding presentation., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=No quantifiable data is presented, such as percentage improvements or cost reductions, which are crucial for depicting impact. Incorporating specific figures could greatly enhance the resume's perceived effectiveness., repetitionAvoidance=There is noticeable repetition of similar duties across different roles, which makes the resume feel redundant. Differentiating roles by highlighting unique contributions would aid in impression., accomplishmentLanguage=The language is more responsibility-oriented than accomplishment-driven. Adjusting wording to reflect achievements rather than duties can make the resume stand out.}, crispness={feedback=The resume stretches over what appears to be a lengthy format, considering the candidate's experience level. Bullet points and content should be more concise to maintain engagement and clarity., resumeLength=The length exceeds what is typically advisable for this experience level, leading to potential recruiter disengagement. Condensing content by focusing on key achievements could help., score=50, bulletPointsCount=There's an excessive number of bullet points, particularly in detailed role descriptions, which detracts from the focus. Streamlining to highlight key points is recommended., fillerWords=Several filler words are present, which bloats the text and hinders straightforward communication. Trimming unnecessary words will sharpen the resume., bulletPointLength=Many bullet points are overly long, containing multiple ideas where single, concise premises would be more effective. Keeping bullet points between 1 to 2 lines is ideal., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=There are multiple instances of buzzwords which dilute the professionalism of the resume. Formatting inconsistencies, especially date presentation, need addressing., score=58, buzzwordsCliches=Common terms like 'challenging environment' or 'asset to my organization' appear frequently, which can weaken the impact. Using unique, specific phrases would improve the resume., datesFormatting=Inconsistent date formatting could confuse readers; ensure it's uniform across the resume for clarity. Stick to a single format, like 'Month Year - Month Year', for professionalism., activeVoice=The resume generally uses passive voice, making the text less direct and assertive. Converting statements to active voice would improve engagement and clarity., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=Personal pronouns are wisely avoided, maintaining a professional tone throughout the resume. This aspect adheres well to resume writing conventions.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-09-28T11:04:06.995056, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-09-28 11:04:06, id=8e518b62-42ff-40a8-9711-a12ffcc01577, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=136, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=136}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-nano={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-nano}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-09-28 11:03:58, status=in-progress}

{created_at_str=2025-09-28 11:03:58, agent_id=5c934d64-413f-47ee-8326-981f39f451da, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-09-28T11:03:58.541049, scheduled_at=2025-09-28T11:03:58.541025, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+918052195314, provider_call_id=370e4a10-c958-4d72-a24d-fd3497cf1d24, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+918052195314, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-09-28 16:23:16, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=AVANISH, resume_review_id=68d9134d18c34103788b5573, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=57, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume contains essential sections like Education and Experience, but lacks a clear summary. Contact details are present but not neatly structured, affecting the readability., score=60, readability=While the font size and style are readable, the overall format could use some styling to enhance quick scanning. The block of text in the Objective section hampers readability., essentialSectionsPresence=Experience is not in the recommended reverse chronological order, which can confuse readers. Educational qualifications are well listed, but certifications or additional skills aren't highlighted adequately., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume is moderately compatible with ATS requirements, though lacks key industry-specific keywords. Improving keyword relevance to the candidate's field would enhance ATS performance significantly., score=62, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Essential sections are identifiable, but there's potential for missing keyword optimization that boosts ATS ranking. Adding specific technical skills or industry terms will improve ATS readability.}, impact={feedback=The resume lacks measurable achievements that could highlight the candidate's impact. It contains repetitive information across job roles, which reduces its effectiveness., score=55, spellCheck=No obvious spelling errors are present, suggesting a good level of attention to detail in this regard. However, occasional grammatical improvements could enhance the resume's professionalism., bulletPointsUsage=The use of bullet points for detailing roles is noted, but they lack focus and are sometimes too descriptive rather than impactful. Simplifying and structuring bullet points could improve clarity., weakActionVerbs=Action verbs are weak and don't fully convey achievements or impact. Employing stronger verbs like 'spearheaded,' 'optimized,' or 'enhanced' would provide a more commanding presentation., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=No quantifiable data is presented, such as percentage improvements or cost reductions, which are crucial for depicting impact. Incorporating specific figures could greatly enhance the resume's perceived effectiveness., repetitionAvoidance=There is noticeable repetition of similar duties across different roles, which makes the resume feel redundant. Differentiating roles by highlighting unique contributions would aid in impression., accomplishmentLanguage=The language is more responsibility-oriented than accomplishment-driven. Adjusting wording to reflect achievements rather than duties can make the resume stand out.}, crispness={feedback=The resume stretches over what appears to be a lengthy format, considering the candidate's experience level. Bullet points and content should be more concise to maintain engagement and clarity., resumeLength=The length exceeds what is typically advisable for this experience level, leading to potential recruiter disengagement. Condensing content by focusing on key achievements could help., score=50, bulletPointsCount=There's an excessive number of bullet points, particularly in detailed role descriptions, which detracts from the focus. Streamlining to highlight key points is recommended., fillerWords=Several filler words are present, which bloats the text and hinders straightforward communication. Trimming unnecessary words will sharpen the resume., bulletPointLength=Many bullet points are overly long, containing multiple ideas where single, concise premises would be more effective. Keeping bullet points between 1 to 2 lines is ideal., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=There are multiple instances of buzzwords which dilute the professionalism of the resume. Formatting inconsistencies, especially date presentation, need addressing., score=58, buzzwordsCliches=Common terms like 'challenging environment' or 'asset to my organization' appear frequently, which can weaken the impact. Using unique, specific phrases would improve the resume., datesFormatting=Inconsistent date formatting could confuse readers; ensure it's uniform across the resume for clarity. Stick to a single format, like 'Month Year - Month Year', for professionalism., activeVoice=The resume generally uses passive voice, making the text less direct and assertive. Converting statements to active voice would improve engagement and clarity., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=Personal pronouns are wisely avoided, maintaining a professional tone throughout the resume. This aspect adheres well to resume writing conventions.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-09-28T11:04:02.753452, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-09-28 11:04:02, id=8e518b62-42ff-40a8-9711-a12ffcc01577, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=136, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=136}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-nano={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-nano}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-09-28 11:03:58, status=ringing}

{created_at_str=2025-09-28 11:03:58, agent_id=5c934d64-413f-47ee-8326-981f39f451da, total_cost=0.0, batch_id=null, cost_breakdown={synthesizer=0.0, transcriber=0, synthesizer_breakdown={welcome_message=0.0, conversation=0}, llm=0, platform=0, transcriber_breakdown={analytics=0, conversation=0}, network=0, llm_breakdown={analytics=0, summarization=0, extraction=0, conversation=0, hangup=0}}, created_at=2025-09-28T11:03:58.541049, scheduled_at=2025-09-28T11:03:58.541025, custom_extractions=null, telephony_data={duration=0.0, to_number=+918052195314, provider_call_id=370e4a10-c958-4d72-a24d-fd3497cf1d24, hosted_telephony=false, recording_url=null, provider=plivo, hangup_provider_code=null, from_number=+918035316264, call_type=outbound, hangup_by=null, hangup_reason=null}, context_details={recipient_phone_number=+918052195314, recipient_data={recipient_phone_number=null, review_completed=2025-09-28 16:23:16, callback_request_id=null, is_callback=null, fullName=AVANISH, resume_review_id=68d9134d18c34103788b5573, reviewDetails={overallScore={score=57, scale=100}, detailedFeedback={layoutAndSearchability={feedback=The resume contains essential sections like Education and Experience, but lacks a clear summary. Contact details are present but not neatly structured, affecting the readability., score=60, readability=While the font size and style are readable, the overall format could use some styling to enhance quick scanning. The block of text in the Objective section hampers readability., essentialSectionsPresence=Experience is not in the recommended reverse chronological order, which can confuse readers. Educational qualifications are well listed, but certifications or additional skills aren't highlighted adequately., scale=100}, atsReadabilityScore={feedback=The resume is moderately compatible with ATS requirements, though lacks key industry-specific keywords. Improving keyword relevance to the candidate's field would enhance ATS performance significantly., score=62, scale=100, keyElementsReadableByATS=Essential sections are identifiable, but there's potential for missing keyword optimization that boosts ATS ranking. Adding specific technical skills or industry terms will improve ATS readability.}, impact={feedback=The resume lacks measurable achievements that could highlight the candidate's impact. It contains repetitive information across job roles, which reduces its effectiveness., score=55, spellCheck=No obvious spelling errors are present, suggesting a good level of attention to detail in this regard. However, occasional grammatical improvements could enhance the resume's professionalism., bulletPointsUsage=The use of bullet points for detailing roles is noted, but they lack focus and are sometimes too descriptive rather than impactful. Simplifying and structuring bullet points could improve clarity., weakActionVerbs=Action verbs are weak and don't fully convey achievements or impact. Employing stronger verbs like 'spearheaded,' 'optimized,' or 'enhanced' would provide a more commanding presentation., scale=100, quantifyingImpact=No quantifiable data is presented, such as percentage improvements or cost reductions, which are crucial for depicting impact. Incorporating specific figures could greatly enhance the resume's perceived effectiveness., repetitionAvoidance=There is noticeable repetition of similar duties across different roles, which makes the resume feel redundant. Differentiating roles by highlighting unique contributions would aid in impression., accomplishmentLanguage=The language is more responsibility-oriented than accomplishment-driven. Adjusting wording to reflect achievements rather than duties can make the resume stand out.}, crispness={feedback=The resume stretches over what appears to be a lengthy format, considering the candidate's experience level. Bullet points and content should be more concise to maintain engagement and clarity., resumeLength=The length exceeds what is typically advisable for this experience level, leading to potential recruiter disengagement. Condensing content by focusing on key achievements could help., score=50, bulletPointsCount=There's an excessive number of bullet points, particularly in detailed role descriptions, which detracts from the focus. Streamlining to highlight key points is recommended., fillerWords=Several filler words are present, which bloats the text and hinders straightforward communication. Trimming unnecessary words will sharpen the resume., bulletPointLength=Many bullet points are overly long, containing multiple ideas where single, concise premises would be more effective. Keeping bullet points between 1 to 2 lines is ideal., scale=100}, qualityAddOn={feedback=There are multiple instances of buzzwords which dilute the professionalism of the resume. Formatting inconsistencies, especially date presentation, need addressing., score=58, buzzwordsCliches=Common terms like 'challenging environment' or 'asset to my organization' appear frequently, which can weaken the impact. Using unique, specific phrases would improve the resume., datesFormatting=Inconsistent date formatting could confuse readers; ensure it's uniform across the resume for clarity. Stick to a single format, like 'Month Year - Month Year', for professionalism., activeVoice=The resume generally uses passive voice, making the text less direct and assertive. Converting statements to active voice would improve engagement and clarity., scale=100, personalPronounsUsage=Personal pronouns are wisely avoided, maintaining a professional tone throughout the resume. This aspect adheres well to resume writing conventions.}}}, parentBolnaId=null, attemptType=null}, resume_review_id=null}, extracted_data=null, arq_job_id=null, transcript=null, updated_at=2025-09-28T11:04:01.539568, answered_by_voice_mail=null, batch_run_details=null, provider=plivo, updated_at_str=2025-09-28 11:04:01, id=8e518b62-42ff-40a8-9711-a12ffcc01577, campaign_id=null, summary=null, error_message=null, rescheduled_at_str=null, agent_extraction=null, transfer_call_data=null, parsedAgentExtraction=null, smart_status=null, conversation_duration=0.0, usage_breakdown={transcriber_usage_breakdown={transcriber_duration=0, provider_connected=false}, transcriber_duration=0, transcriber_model=nova-3, synthesizer_characters=136, synthesizer_usage_breakdown={provider_connected=false, conversation_characters=0, welcome_message_cache=false, welcome_message_characters=136}, transcriber_provider=deepgram, synthesizer_model=eleven_turbo_v2_5, llmModel={azure_gpt-4_1-nano={output=0, input=0}}, llmTokens=0, llm_usage_breakdown={analytics=null, summarization=null, extraction=null, conversation={output=0, input=0, provider_connected=false, provider=azure, model=azure/gpt-4.1-nano}, hangup=null}, synthesizer_provider=elevenlabs}, workflow_retries=null, rescheduled_at=null, scheduled_at_str=2025-09-28 11:03:58, status=initiated}